DiNapoli’s first snag at NY State fund as markets sour again

After three tumultuous years of reforms including a raft of new policies and procedures at the third-largest pension fund in the US, culminating in a 25.9 per cent return last year, Thomas DiNapoli, the New York State Comptroller, has hit a snag in the last quarter.The New York State Common Retirement Fund (CRF) returned  -4.38 per cent in the June quarter, it was announced last week, ending the period with $124.8 billion invested. This is the first bad news for the fund, which attracts a lot of politically inspired commentary, for more than a year.

The reformist DiNapoli, who oversees all audits of state government agencies as well as acting as sole trustee for the CRF, introduced quarterly reporting as part of his policy on greater transparency. He also commissioned an audit, by Mercer Sentinel, of his own compliance at the fund, going through investment decisions back to the start of his term in February 2007. The report this year found one small mistake, when a management fee was disclosed separately from a contract.

Throughout the global financial crisis, DiNapoli, a former state legislator, stood by his staff’s decisions on allocations to alternatives and direct investments, as the fund’s total value dropped from over $150 billion, while also tilting the equities portfolio towards New York-resident companies and stepping up a program to invest in mortgages for affordable housing.

The 25.9 per cent return for the year to March, compares with solid but less spectacular returns for the (admittedly different periods) two larger pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS. CalPERS earned 11.6 per cent in the year to June, while CalSTRS earned 12.2 per cent.

The CRF annual result was helped by returns of just over 50 per cent each for domestic and international broad market equities. In June the CRF terminated a $600 million global ex-US mandate with Goldman Sachs Asset Management. It made its first investment in emerging managers within its absolute returns strategy, giving $200 million to a fund-of-funds called Rock Creek Empire Fund. It also invested another 20 million euro ($25.75 million) through an existing European buyout manager, Gilde Buyout Fund.

DiNapoli also introduced a policy banning the use of placement agents in mandate appointments; forbidding the fund from doing business with anyone who made a political donation to the Comptroller’s Office in the past two years and introduced monthly reporting of manager hirings and firings.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous