Defined benefit still dominates largest funds

Defined benefit funds still dominate the structure of the largest 300 pension funds globally, and this troop of large funds now make up almost half of all pension assets around the world.

The total assets of the world’s largest 300 pension funds grew by 11 per cent in 2010 to a total of $12.5 trillion, an all-time high, according to this year’s P&I/Towers Watson global 300 ranking.

Defined benefit funds still account for 70 per cent of assets, and grew by 8 per cent last year. Defined contribution funds grew by 11 per cent.

There is a geographical shift underway in the dominance of pension assets, and while the US still has the largest share of pension assets, with 34 per cent, this has declined from 45 per cent only five years ago.

Europe has had the highest five-year growth rate of 11 per cent.

An analysis of the annualised growth rates of the countries that make up the top 20 shows funds in China recorded a massive 38.9 per cent growth rate. The next largest was Norway with 18.5 per cent.

Sponsored Content

There was little shift in the rankings of the largest funds, with the Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan still the largest fund – at $1.4 trillion it is nearly three times the next largest – a position it has held for the past eight years.

Notable movements in the rankings were the Canada Pension Plan which moved from 12th to 8th; the GEPF of South Africa which moved from 18th to 15th; and the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan which moved in to the top 20 from 22nd (it replaced the General Motors).

According to global head of investment at Towers Watson, Carl Hess, the asset allocation of these large funds has shifted to a more conservative status over the past five years. The top 20 funds, on average, now have an equal amount in equities and bonds (about 40 per cent in each) with the remainder in alternatives and cash, he says.

 

P&I/Towers Watson 300 ranking ($US millions)

Rank Fund Total Assets
1 Government Pension Investment Fund, Japan $1,432,122
2 Government Pension Fund Global, Norway $550,858
3 ABP, Netherlands $318,807
4 National Pension Fund, Korea $289,418
5 Federal Retirement Thrift Savings Plan, US $264,013
6 CalPERS, US $214,387
7 Local Government Officials, Japan $189,633
8 Canada Pension Plan, Canada $149,142
9 Employees Provident Fund, Malaysia $145, 570
10 Central Provident Fund, Singapore $144,844
11 CalSTRS, US $138,888
12 New York State Common, US $133,023
13 PFZW, Netherlands $133,002
14 National Social Security, China $129,789
15 GEPF, South Africa $128,232
16 Pension Fund Association, Japan $124, 987
17 ATP, Denmark $123, 757
18 Florida State Board, US $123,373
19 New York City Retirement, US $115,024
20 Ontario Teachers, Canada $108,148

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous