Cost saving on radar for Canada’s PSP as more assets come inhouse

The C$41 billion ($38 billion) Public Sector Pension Investment Board plans to bring more assets in house in a bid to lower costs, and will increase the number of direct investments to increase control, the chair Paul Cantor said at the annual public meeting.

Cantor said managing assets internally represented substantial savings when compared to having external portfolio managers manage assets.

“If we outsourced all of PSP Investments’ asset management to outside fund managers, it would cost an additional $135 million in management fees per year, after taking into account the savings in salaries and benefits,” he said.

In addition to bringing more assets in house it plans to increase the proportion of internal active management in public markets and implement a “value opportunity investing strategy”.

The fund is increasingly bringing functions in house with the development of a new internal function for asset-liability modelling one such example.

Sponsored Content

According to Cantor, speaking at the meeting, one of the key corporate objectives for fiscal year 2010 is to define a policy portfolio, within an asset-liability framework, taking into account the liabilities of the plans and optimising the policy portfolio structure. As well as develop internal asset-liability capabilities and a model.

For the first six months of the 2010 financial year the PSP recorded a return of 15 per cent.

The fund has a target policy of investing 62 per cent world equity (with about 30 per cent in domestic equities), 15 per cent in nominal fixed income, and 23 per cent in real return assets, which includes world inflation-linked bonds, real estate and infrastructure.

PSP Investments also has a new product committee such that any new investment or financial instruments may need to be reviewed by the committee and approved by management. That list then goes to the investment committee on an annual basis.

PSIP Investments continues to undergo an enterprise risk management initiative that began in 2008, and has completed a strategic investment-related process to identify, prioritise and review appropriate recommendations to mitigate risk.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous