Cost saving on radar for Canada’s PSP as more assets come inhouse

The C$41 billion ($38 billion) Public Sector Pension Investment Board plans to bring more assets in house in a bid to lower costs, and will increase the number of direct investments to increase control, the chair Paul Cantor said at the annual public meeting.

Cantor said managing assets internally represented substantial savings when compared to having external portfolio managers manage assets.

“If we outsourced all of PSP Investments’ asset management to outside fund managers, it would cost an additional $135 million in management fees per year, after taking into account the savings in salaries and benefits,” he said.

In addition to bringing more assets in house it plans to increase the proportion of internal active management in public markets and implement a “value opportunity investing strategy”.

The fund is increasingly bringing functions in house with the development of a new internal function for asset-liability modelling one such example.

Sponsored Content

According to Cantor, speaking at the meeting, one of the key corporate objectives for fiscal year 2010 is to define a policy portfolio, within an asset-liability framework, taking into account the liabilities of the plans and optimising the policy portfolio structure. As well as develop internal asset-liability capabilities and a model.

For the first six months of the 2010 financial year the PSP recorded a return of 15 per cent.

The fund has a target policy of investing 62 per cent world equity (with about 30 per cent in domestic equities), 15 per cent in nominal fixed income, and 23 per cent in real return assets, which includes world inflation-linked bonds, real estate and infrastructure.

PSP Investments also has a new product committee such that any new investment or financial instruments may need to be reviewed by the committee and approved by management. That list then goes to the investment committee on an annual basis.

PSIP Investments continues to undergo an enterprise risk management initiative that began in 2008, and has completed a strategic investment-related process to identify, prioritise and review appropriate recommendations to mitigate risk.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous