China expert warns on bad positioning

While the China-growth story was not new, an expert in investing in the region said investors should consider if their current exposure to the economic giant took advantage of where future growth was predicted to occur.

Michael Jiang (pictured), a portfolio manager at the Hong Kong-based Harvest Fund Management told attendees at the Conexus Financial Fiduciary Investors Symposium that many fund managers may be unaware that they are poorly positioned to take advantage of the expected boom in consumer demand in China.

Harvest is a thematic investor and stock picker which targets predominately Hong Kong and overseas-listed mainland companies.

Jiang is a Beijing-based portfolio manager responsible for the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) fund.

The fund raises money from mainland mutual fund investors and invests it overseas, primarily in Chinese companies listed overseas.

Jiang said many fund managers that tracked common indexes such as the MSCI China, CSI 300 and HSCEI might not realise that these indexes were typically overweight financial and energy sector and underweight potential future growth sectors.

Sponsored Content

On aggregate, the financials and energy sectors represented 41 per cent of the CSI 300, 56 per cent of the MSCI China and 81 per cent of the HSCEI.

“While both these sectors have been important beneficiaries of China’s fast growing economy they may underperform at certain stages of the economic cycle,” Jiang said.

Furthermore, Jiang said broader indexes such as the MSCI World index were underweight China, with the index having just a 2.3 per cent Chinese representation.

China, now the world’s second biggest economy, represented 14 per cent of global GDP. Hong Kong and Chinese companies made up 11 per cent of total global equity market capitalisation.

“China exerts a much larger influence on the global economy and on global markets than this (MSCI World Index) weighting would suggest,” Jiang said.

“As a result global investors are typically structurally underweight China with the existing MSCI World Index investing.”

Jiang rated health care, consumer, information technology as growth sectors and noted that on aggregate they made up less than 0.5 per cent of the MSCI World Index.

Their representation in the MSCI global emerging market index was also small.

Other attractive growth sectors such as education, tourism, energy conservation and environment protection were entirely missing from the indexes, says Jiang.

“Investors tracking these indexes do not get exposure to the sweet spots of China’s economy,” he said.

He advised a thematic investment approach to look at cross-sector themes.

Investors looking for additional exposure to these future growth areas should invest in a much less constrained portfolio which was benchmark unaware and had no specific sector guidelines, Jiang said.

A range of satellite-China products offered equity investment portfolios with this capacity.

One response to “China expert warns on bad positioning”

  1. With so much bubble built in Asia now, portfolio need to be re-balanced for risks.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous