CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that development. The SIRI aims to drive innovative thought leadership to advance CalPERS’ understanding of sustainability factors and the impact they have on financial performance.

At CalPERS sustainability has expanded beyond the notion of the environment to stabilisation in capital markets, and in the past couple of years it has undergone a comprehensive review of sustainability culminating in the board adopting a total-fund approach last year.

Three kinds of capital

Within three forms of economic capital – financial, human and physical – the fund has identified the strategic themes of alignment of interest, human capital and climate change that set the framework for the fund’s environmental, social and governance integration.

“We came up with the framework for CalPERS in the financial capital, physical capital and human capital. The question is what does that mean for strategy for allocating capital? Through this enquiry, and looking for thinking, research and debate, we will set out investment beliefs in July,” Anne Simpson, senior portfolio manager and director of global governance at CalPERS, says.


“When I arrived this was defined as corporate governance and was in global equities. That has moved to a portfolio-wide strategy integrating ESG into sustainability and linking it into financials. That has not been done before, at least not in the US. Our job is to be breaking ground. This is a significant moment.”

The fund is also calling for papers to contribute to a debate on ESG and long-term value creation and capital market stability. It will work with the University of California Davis Graduate School of Management to assess the papers, which will co-host a Sustainability and Finance Symposium on June 7 with Columbia Law School’s Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership. Following the symposium, the board will review the findings and finalise its investment beliefs for a July deadline.

“There is a huge amount of anecdotal ad-hoc conclusions and we need definitions of what is relevant. Once we have decided what the relevant factors are, we want to know how to allocate capital. Investment beliefs need to be something on which you are willing to act.”

Sponsored Content

Governance transformed

In the three years that Simpson has been at CalPERS, the governance program has been transformed. It has stopped calling the program corporate governance, and is looking at the governance agenda in a broader way, reflected by its new name, global governance.

“When I arrived this was defined as corporate governance and was in global equities. That has moved to a portfolio-wide strategy integrating ESG into sustainability and linking it into financials. That has not been done before, at least not in the US. Our job is to be breaking ground. This is a significant moment,” she says.

Simpson has previously said that investors need to put the “F into ESG”, referring to the integration of financial and ESG analysis, a point that many institutional investors globally need to overcome. They want to integrate ESG factors, and see the value of a sustainability lens, they just don’t know how to do it.

Simpson says that for CalPERS, sustainability is simply defined as the “ability to continue”.

“If you start to take on board the view that you’re a century of liabilities, then you look at risk and return through a different lens,” she says. “If you believe risk is always rewarded, then you will behave in a certain way. We have never had investment beliefs.”

While CalPERS has been vocal and influential with regard to legislative change such as the Volcker Rule and derivatives reform, Simpson says that has not been done within a wider framework.

In addition, CalPERS has started its triennial asset-liability modelling, a process that will take all year. “We pay pensions in cash but invest over a very long term; it’s an interesting debate about assets and liabilities,” Simpson says.

The seven tenets of investment 
In May last year the risk management group at CalPERS presented a list of seven recommended investment beliefs to the investment committee of the board. They were:

  1. Strategic asset allocation is the dominant determinant of risk and return
  2. A return premium is required to take on risk
  3. Premium is required for illiquidity
  4. Long-term investment horizon is an advantage
  5. Inefficiencies in the market create investment opportunities
  6. Costs matter
  7. Risk is multi-faceted and not fully quantifiable.

 

For more information on the Sustainability and Finance Symposium and to submit a paper, click here.

For an academic view on the importance of investment beliefs and how, in particular, beliefs relating to risk can impact performance, click here.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous