CalPERS’ securities lending loss

CalPERS will continue its securities lending program following an annual review, despite significant pressure on its collateral pool, with income of $220 million generated for the year to March but unrealised losses on the internal collateral reinvestment of $854 million.

In a report to the board, the fund’s consultant, Wilshire said the significant unrealised loss in the collateral pool is likely to result in a total eventual loss to the fund of between $500 million and $1 billion.

This is due to the drop in prices on a lot of instruments purchased by CalPERS, with some securities defaulting or expected to default.

In an effort to limit any additional losses, the investment team has restricted all new investments to overnight securities, as they work out the damage to the collateral pool.

The internal staff annual review of the securities lending program confirmed the use of the program, a decision endorsed by Wilshire’s assessment.

In the past 12 months the fund held four auctions awarding more than $113 billion in assets to 11 borrowers, and in the past eight years CalPERS has auctioned off access to $835 billion in assets through 33 separate auctions, with cumulative net earnings of $1.4 billion.

Sponsored Content

Despite the failure, and merger, of several large counterparties over the past year, CalPERS has suffered no losses from defaults in any of its securities on loan.

According to Wilshire, CalPERS, like other lenders, requires over-collateralisation for all loans, and has simply kept the collateral, for no gain or loss, when a counterparty defaulted or declared bankruptcy. CalPERS had lent money to Lehman Brothers but incurred no losses on its default.

For the year to the end of March 2009, the average market value of securities on loan for the year was $33.5 billion, with annualised earnings of 23 bps. The large unrealised loss amount was due to CalPERS use of mark-to-market accounting on the valuation of the internal cash pool, which is not market convention on collateral reinvestment pools. The external portfolios use amortised cost pricing.

“This success reinforces the value of the auction platform and the demand in the marketplace to borrow CalPERS’ - the internal staff report said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous