CalPERS to link pay with performance

The CalPERS board will have the discretion to reduce or eliminate investment staff performance pay in years of negative performance of the fund, in a revised compensation plan to be presented to the board this week, chief investment officer Joe Dear told conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com.

“We are also proposing to simplify asset class level payments so the components for portfolio managers are more simple,” he said, demonstrating with an example that one portfolio manager had seven different levels of measurement.

“We are going to present a revised compensation plan for the board, we’ve done a lot of work on this,” he said.

Dear said a fair and transparent compensation model for investment staff was part of the investment management balance between art and science.

“We want to have an increasingly visible and transparent process so it encourages debate… we want to do the art along with the science.”

Sponsored Content

The fund has had its existing investment office compensation program since 1997 when it was designed by Watson Wyatt, but it hired Mercer Consulting to review the program in December last year.

Mercer highlighted some of the challenges that CalPERS, and other organizations face, including:

1. Attracting high visibility and scrutiny as a large, public entity;

2. Fielding questions about the relative performance design component common to investment office incentive plans, such as how can the plan pay-out incentives when the fund value is down;

3. Attracting and retaining high calibre investment professionals to the non-Wall Street investment community;

4. Providing creative alternatives for compensation investment professionals that are fair, competitive and reasonable; and

5. Simplifying investment compensation strategies to promote transparency.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous