CalPERS hires Mercer for compensation review

The $200 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) has hired Mercer Consulting review the investment office incentive compensation program, a design set up in 1997 under the guidance of the board’s compensation consultant Watson Wyatt.

The appointment of Mercer, designed to give a new perspective, follows a directive to staff in May to review the existing incentive compensation program and propose modifications to simplify it.

The redesign project will include reviewing CalPER’s current compensation plan as well as analyzing incentive compensation practices in relevant sectors such as other pension funds, endowments, and asset management firms. Mercer will then design a new incentive program and discuss it with the key stakeholders at CalPERS, including the head of the human resources chief Chris O’Brien.

Mercer has begun the process of individual interviews and has interviewed the CIO, senior investment officers, human resources and policy business support divisions. It recommends it has access to select board members and relevant senior management, with the estimated completion date the end of March 2010.

In assessing compensation programs against the market Mercer will review the size and complexity of the operations, assets under management, internally versus externally managed funds; the individual scope and responsibility of each position, and the relative market competition.

Sponsored Content

Mercer highlighted some of the challenges that CalPERS, and other organizations face, including:

Attracting high visibility and scrutiny as a large, public entity;

Fielding questions about the relative performance design component common to investment office incentive plans, such as how can the plan pay out incentives when the fund value is down;

Attracting and retaining high calibre investment professionals to the non-Wall Street investment community;

Providing creative alternatives for compensation investment professionals that are fair, competitive and reasonable; and Simplifying investment compensation strategies to promote transparency.

Nanci Hibschman, principal in the human capital business of Mercer’s San Fransisco office, is the lead compensation consultant, and Louis Finney, principal in Mercer Investment Consulting’s Chicago office is the lead investment consultant.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous