CalPERS commits to defined benefit

A set of 12 federal legislative policy priorities adopted by the board of CalPERS underpins the fund’s commitment to preserving defined benefit plans, and positions the fund firmly in the defined benefit camp in the debate over pension design.

Vice-president of CalPERS board, Dr George Diehr (pictured), said dismantling defined benefit plans or imposing unreasonable mandates would only further erode confidence in America’s retirement system.

The fund has adopted a set of priorities which will serve as a “road map” for advancing CalPERS’ federal governmental goals on retirement, outline its positions on retirement benefits, funding and accountability of pension plans and social security.

CalPERS’ priorities call for the pension plan to support:

  • defined benefit retirement plans that provide sound income replacement in retirement through shared employee and employer responsibility
  • expanded opportunities for workers to have access to a defined benefit pension plan
  • tax policies that encourage preservation of pension plans and retirement savings accounts by allowing deferral of taxation contributions and earnings until benefits are paid in retirement
  • policies that ensure the highest level of integrity and accountability in the administration of supplemental retirement accounts and elements such as fee disclosure
  • policies that report public pension liabilities that reflect the long-term nature of public employee retirement plans
  • accounting standards that preserve the link between accounting and funding such as portfolio diversification, smoothing of investment gains and losses and managing growth of liabilities to minimise contributions volatility, including support of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
  • policies extending the long-term solvency of the Social Security system without reducing benefits for CalPERS members and other Americans

Further, the priorities also call for the fund to oppose:

  • mandates on pension plan design features or policies that would undermine defined benefit plans
  • legislation that would establish mandates requiring specific funding, accounting or actuarial standards for state and local pension plans

The CalPERS priorities can be downloaded here

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Asian equities no longer an asset class?

One of the ironies about the way big pension funds are rethinking their asset allocation strategies is that regional specialisation appears to be becoming less popular, even for the world’s fastest-growing region.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS to finalise alternative asset classifications

CalPERS’s investment committee is expected to make a decision on its alternative asset classification at a November asset liability management workshop.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors must lift ESG reporting standards: MSCI

As MSCI moves to expand its sustainability research capability to emerging markets, its global head of index and ESG research, Remy Briand, has urged investors to dramatically improve their reporting standards to make good on their ESG cause.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The nemesis of cap-weighted indexing turn attention to bonds

First he convinced some of us that cap-weighted indexing doesn’t work, now Rob Arnott, the founder of Research Affiliates, is back with more bombshells – that the equity risk premium, as we came to know it, is gone and not hurrying back; and that emerging market debt is “objectively a better credit risk” than US

Ontario enters second phase of reform

Local pension plans have warmly greeted the second phase of pension reform in Ontario, Canada, through a bill which contains provisions such as restrictions on benefit improvements where amendments will compromise a plan’s funded position. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The challenges of a low return environment

Institutional investors are again in a situation where virtually any combination of publicly traded investments will not meet their return goals, according to director of research at Wurts and Associates, Eric Petroff. So what should they do now?mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous