CalPERS collaborates on enterprise risk assessment

The speed with which CalPERS can fulfil its desire to become a risk intelligent organisation has been given a reality check with discussions between the Californian fund and TIAA-CREF revealing it takes two to five years to fully implement an effective enterprise risk-management structure, and importantly a risk intelligent culture in an organisation.

Members of the governance risk management initiative at CalPERS have met with senior managing director and risk manager for TIAA-CREF, Erwin Martens, to gain some knowledge of the organisational structures and analytical tools put in place when it developed an enterprise risk-management structure and team in 2003.

In discussing the development of the structure, Martens warned of the long timeframe indicating it remained a work in progress.

He said adopting an enterprise approach to managing risk involved the creation of a risk-aware management culture. He shared several analytical tools for identifying, analysing and monitoring risk as well as organisation and structural insights

The CalPERS’ governance risk-management initiative has just completed phase III of a five-phase scoping plan of risk management which included a series of focus groups revealing  a number of themes with regard to attitude to risk at the fund:

Sponsored Content

1. Risk is most often viewed in terms of short-term or immediate consequences rather than with a longer-term perspective

2. Management tends to react to situations rather than proactively try to forecast risk exposure

3. The organisation has procedures and in some instances policies in place however, over the years the practice rather than procedures and policy apparently provide guidance for operations

4. The organisation has to make decisions together to effectively manage risk

5. Compliance and legal risks were thought to be the lowest

6. Improving all aspects of communication is seen as one of the most immediate benefits of adopting an enterprise risk-management strategy

7. There is a risk in not providing the board with complete information

Phase IV is expected to be completed by the end of May with preliminary recommendations provided to a risk-management committee meeting in August.

The investment office is also conducting a rigorous review of its risk management organisation and approaches to enable a complimentary approach to risk management.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

AP2 appoints another new CIO

The SEK 204 billion ($28 billion) Second Swedish National Pension Fund/AP2 has appointed its fourth chief investment officer in four years, as the fund reports its best annual return since inception. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

France’s SWF names manager selection committee

France’s €33 billion Sovereign Wealth Fund, the Fonds de Reserve Pour Les Retraites, has made four appointments to its independent manager selection committee tasked with reviewing all mandate bids by funds managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Climate change expert upbeat on post-Copenhagen opportunities

Global head of climate change investment research at DB Climate Change Advisors, Mark Fulton, has a contrary view to most observers, post-Copenhagen. He spoke to Amanda White about the climate change market and the asset allocation implications for investors. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP’s split portfolio

The performance of the hedging portfolio and a 43 per cent allocation to interest-rate sensitive bonds in the investment beta portfolio of the DKK352 billion ($65 billion) ATP were the main contributors to the group increasing pension reserves by one third last year. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Ibbotson reveals the ABCs – alphas, betas and costs – of hedge funds

Hedge funds, in aggregate, have generated positive alpha in the past 11 years. This finding, made by Roger Ibbotson, founder of Ibbotson Associates and Professor of Finance at Yale University, proves the strategies can resist powerful market declines but often fall short of providing absolute returns to investors. He spoke with Simon Mumme about the

CalPERS rates reputational risk above investments

Risk to reputation is more important than risk to investments according to a survey of internal staff at CalPERS completed as part of its governance/risk management initiative. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous