CalPERS: a new framework of economy

CalPERS has adopted 10 preliminary investment principles following a board offsite in July, but a number of topics, including the role of active management, are still under debate ahead of the September board meeting that is the deadline for the principles’ adoption.

The $266-billion Californian fund began the process for establishing investment principles in January and the workshops have been guided by Towers Watson.

While many of the draft investment beliefs could be described as more generic investment-related principles – such as CalPERS articulating its investment goals and performance measures and ensure clear accountability for their execution – the fund has also adopted a unique view of its fiduciary duty.

Anne Simpson, director of corporate governance at CalPERS, says it has wrapped a new framework of economy around the fund, including three forms of capital.

Specifically it states that “long-term value creation requires effective management of three forms of capital: financial, physical and human”.

“We have some old-fashioned economics to ground what we’re doing and why sustainability matters,” she says. “It is ground-breaking stuff this investment beliefs work. We want to be engaged owners. This is a transformation, it’s like the oil tanker turning around.”

Sponsored Content

Questioning duty

In the past CalPERS chief executive Ann Stausboll has also been vocal in questioning the fiduciary duty of pension funds.

At the Ceres conference in January 2012 she said the fiduciary duty of pension funds should extend to issues outside the parameters typically understood as being directly related to beneficiaries’ financial interests.

Stausboll said it is a fiduciary duty of investors not only to manage risk and look for opportunities associated with climate change, but also to push for business and government action to tackle environmental and sustainability issues.

“We’ve made enormous progress in just the past few years, but we need to keep up our continued engagement with companies and policymakers to help advance the transition to a sustainable global economy,” Stausboll said.

“As fiduciaries, it is our job to make sure investors, businesses and policymakers are responding aggressively and creatively to the risks and opportunities associated with climate change and other sustainability issues.”

This sentiment has now been reflected in one of the draft principles to come out of the July offsite: “CalPERS investment decisions may reflect wider stakeholder views, provided they are consistent with its fiduciary duty to members and beneficiaries”.

Woven right through

Simpson says the fund now has a goal of integration for sustainability, which is a long way from the “scattered initiatives” of a few years ago. “The thinking is woven right through,” she says. “We are thinking about future members and pensioners and encouraging managers to do the same.”

CalPERS will also be pushing its managers further on cost and disclosure issues.

Another principle is that “costs matter” and as part of this all costs should be transparent. But Simpson points out that this is difficult in the private asset classes. “In these asset classes there is no disclosure of carry. We are pushing the thinking on this.”

 

The July draft

The 10 investment beliefs, listed below, required a “super majority” or two thirds of the board votes, to move forward for consideration or adoption at the September investment committee, at which the fund’s investment beliefs will be finalised.

Since the April investment committee workshop, a number of topics have required additional discussion, that will continue until September. The issues for further discussion are: active management, investment performance targets and alignment of interests, the approach to integrating sustainability into investment decision making, and risk management and measurement.

The fund, which returned 12.5 per cent for the year to June 30, 2013, outperforming its benchmark by 1.5 percentage points, is also doing its triennial asset liability study.

Here are CalPERS’ draft investment beliefs asthey were in July 2013.

  1. Liabilities should influence the asset structure.
  2. A long time-investment horizon is a responsibility and an advantage.
  3. CalPERS investment decisions may reflect wider stakeholder views, provided they are consistent with its fiduciary duty to members and beneficiaries.
  4. Long-term value creation requires effective management of three forms of capital: financial, physical and human.
  5. CalPERS shall articulate its investment goals and performance measures and ensure clear accountability for their execution.
  6. Strategic asset allocation is the dominant determinant of portfolio risk and return.
  7. CalPERS will take risk only where we have a strong belief we will be rewarded for it.
  8. Costs matter and need to be effectively managed.
  9. Risk to CalPERS is multi-faceted and not fully captured through measures such as volatility or tracking error.
  10. Strong processes and teamwork and deep resources are needed to achieve CalPERS goals and objectives.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous