Calls for global governance code go unheard

The global application of a code of best practice for institutional investors, developed by the UK Financial Reporting Council, was debated at the International Corporate Governance Network’s annual conference in Toronto. Amanda White reports.


anne_sheehan_nlThe International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) has been looking at a code of best practice for institutional investors for years. Now a collaboration of four associations in the UK have collectively written a governance code for local constituents.

Peter Montagnon, senior investment adviser at the Financial Reporting Council, which is the UK’s independent regulator responsible for promoting confidence in corporate reporting and governance, says a final version of the code will be released at the end of this month.

While it has been difficult to get consensus, the associations, including the Association of British Insurers, NAPF and the Investment Management Association, have finally agreed on seven principles that will underpin the new Stewardship Code. The next, and perhaps more critical stage, is the must-have buy-in from investors.

One of the motivations for the code is to improve the quality and effectiveness of the dialogue between shareholders and the companies they invest in.

“We want to improve the quality of communication, not just at annual meetings,” Montagnon says.

Sponsored Content

One of the delicate balances is the relationship between the regulators and shareholders, and Montagnon says shareholders need to be aware of the differences in their motivations.

“The balance between regulators and shareholder enthusiasm is a challenge,” he says. “Shareholders want to increase value, and regulators want to minimise risk and want shareholders to help monitor that. Shareholders have to push back on that.”

The code also aims to set out the chain of participants and ask funds managers to report whether they apply the code.

“If they don’t that’s fine, but if they do we want them to see how they do.”

Montagnon believes the process of engagement needs to be more international and wants to persuade international institutions which hold UK securities to follow the code.

“This needs to be internationalised so it’s not too onerous,” he says.

But Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at CalSTRS believes the idea of a code in the US is a “big leap”.

“We are trying to get our colleagues in the US to make sure they recognise we need to be good stewards, but we are behind the game. I can’t imagine the regulators devising and enforcing it,” she says.

While Sheehan believes a regulatory approach is not the solution in the US, she does believe there is room for larger funds to lead by example.

“CalSTRS started in 1913 and from the beginning we had a culture of looking out for interests of teachers [the fund’s member base]. But were we always good, diligent stewards? Leading up to the crisis, maybe not. We were riding the wave up but not thinking enough about the risks of the way down. We were part of the problem,” she says. “Our board is asking what more could we do to take leadership role, to lead by example.”

Sheehan recommends more transparency as a first step for her US counterparts.

“We are being transparent about our actions, for example we pre-announce our votes. More needs to be done. We want to lead by example with other larger funds and say what we expect from fellow funds. Because we are global investors need to know what’s happening in other parts of the world, but we’re just beginning to walk.”

CalSTRS is going through the process of getting funds managers to integrate sustainability into their investment processes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous