Australian Future Fund favours hedge funds

The A$66 billion ($58.8 billion) Australian Future Fund has tapped its cash portfolio to increase its exposure to alternatives, with cash dropping from 46 to 15 per cent in the past year, including an estimated allocation of $3.7 billion to three hedge fund managers in the fourth quarter of last year.

In the past year the fund has moved from a 46 per cent cash allocation to about 15 per cent, with alternatives increasing over the time period from 3.7 to 11.4 per cent.

Developed market equities and debt securities have also been beneficiaries of the cash allocations in the past year.

Chair of the Future Fund Board of Guardians, David Murrary, said significant progress had been made in transitioning the portfolio towards the long-term asset allocation.

In the final quarter of 2009, the fund, a bellwether for many large super funds in the region, has allocated an estimated $3.7 billion to three hedge fund managers, plus an unspecified amount to three other managers.

Sponsored Content

The three new hedge fund managers are Och Ziff, a US-based multi-strategy manager, BlackRock Alternative Advisors, which has various hedge fund strategies managed from several countries, including the former Quellos Capital Management, and Brevan Howard, a UK-based alternatives manager.

The other new managers are: Macquarie Investment Management for Australian equities; and M&G Investment Management and Vianova Asset Management (a boutique backed by Australian Unity), both for debt securities.

The new hedge fund managers have taken the allocation to alternatives from $2.4 billion to $6.2 billion during the December quarter.

The Future Fund now has mandates with 10 alternatives managers and 58 managers overall.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous