Australian Future Fund piles into debt

The $A51.2 billion ($37.9 billion) Australian Future Fund has quintupled its allocation to debt in the past year, significantly upweighting its exposure to debt securities in the last quarter to 21.9 per cent of the fund.

The fund, which returned -1.32 per cent for the March quarter, had an allocation to debt as low as 4 per cent last April.

In the past quarter, the fund has also constructed a mandate with a Baltimore-based investor in venture capital funds and direct projects, and invested in active domestic equities for the first time.

The Fund’s portfolio update for March 31, 2009 revealed that debt securities exposure jumped to 21.9 per cent from 17.3 per cent in the previous quarter, for the ex-Telstra section of the portfolio.

New mandates with Goldman Sachs Asset Management and mid-market credit specialist Oak Hill Advisors were awarded in the debt securities sector.

JF Capital Partners and Perennial Growth Management were beneficiaries of the Fund’s move into active Australian equities management, with the two firms sharing in the $4.75 billion now allocated to the sector (9.3 per cent of the ex-Telstra component, up from 8.6 per cent last quarter).

Sponsored Content

The lone new private equity mandate was with Montagu Newhall, from Owings Mills on the outskirts of Baltimore, which is an investor in venture capital funds as well as direct VC projects. The Future Fund has not invested in any of its four ‘Global Partners’ funds but rather had a specific mandate constructed for it. Ashton Newhall, a principal of the firm, comes from a family tradition of venture capitalism – his grandfather ran private equity portfolios for the Rockefeller family, where projects included the development of a jet engine.

Two new property mandates were also awarded, to ING Clarion Real Estate Securities and Quadrant Real Estate Advisors.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous