PRI rallies boards on data security

Shot of an unrecognisable hacker using a cellphone and laptop in the dark

Gone are the days when the security of a company’s data was seen as the responsibility of the IT department.These days, it’sa key concern for corporate governance. Boards must take the lead in ensuring data is protected and investigating whether company mechanisms are up to the job.

Cybersecurity risk is real and pervasive, as demonstrated by recent attacks that have put big banks, personal credit rating agencies, internet providers, the UK National Health Service and even the US intelligence community on high alert.

Threats can emerge from various sources, both internal and external, resulting in data breaches that can have a negative impact on share price, reputation and trust in the organisation’s ability to secure sensitive data, including personal information and intellectual property. A 2017 study by IT consultant CGI and Oxford Economics concluded that severe breaches caused share prices to fall by an average of 1.8 per cent.

Despite high-profile incidents, many institutional investors are only just beginning to look at the governance issues surrounding cybersecurity. This year, several cybersecurity-related resolutions have shown that investors are keen to understand how cyber aware their portfolio companies are and whether they have appropriate mechanisms to manage a breach. All of this can be difficult to assess, however, because of gaps in corporate disclosure on this topic.

An additional – and serious – consideration for boards is that the regulatory regime on data privacy and cybersecurity is being strengthened across the world with fines and penalties for data breaches.

Last year, for example, the US Congress has introduced the bipartisan Cybersecurity Disclosure Act of 2017, which would require publicly traded companies to disclose the cybersecurity expertise of any members of the board or general partner and, if the board does not have such expertise, disclose the measures the board has taken to identify and nominate future members.

Sponsored Content

In Europe, the General Data Protection Regulation came into force in May 2018, creating obligations for companies that process and hold data in the EU regardless of where they are located. Notably, the penalties for not adhering to these requirements can be up to €20 million. Similarly, in Australia, the Australian Privacy Act mandates that companies implement security safeguards to protect personal information and notify customers of data breaches.

Investors need to discuss these issues with board directors to raise awareness of potential data compromises and ensure the board is involved in assessing the robustness of security measures. This issue will only continue to intensify in the future, so investors need to start the conversation with companies now to better understand their exposure.

Global collaborative action

To improve corporate disclosure and enhance understanding of the underlying cyber vulnerabilities, Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) has been co-ordinating a global collaborative engagement on this topic. More than 50 institutional investors, representing more than US$12 trillion in assets under management, are now engaging with companies on their cybersecurity governance.

Our report, Stepping up governance on cyber security: What is corporate disclosure telling investors?, provides a snapshot, based on a study of 100 companies, primarily in the healthcare, financial and retail sectors. The study, which forms the basis of our collaborative engagement, found that although companies are increasingly recognising cyber risks and their impacts, corporate information in the public domain does not reassure investors that companies have adequate governance structures and measures in place to deal with cybersecurity challenges.

As this dialogue progresses over the next year or so, participating members will have further clarity on how material cybersecurity risk is for companies in their portfolio, how information flows to the board on cybersecurity matters and what the process is for evaluation against peers.

Using these findings, the PRI will also put together a set of investor expectations on cybersecurity governance that companies should be able to meet. Through this process, investors will be signalling to companies that further meaningful disclosure on cybersecurity is warranted, and this will enable them to discern which companies are likely to manage risks appropriately.

Boards need to work closely with senior management to escalate the message across the organisation that security is everyone’s problem. Keeping data secure is not about buying the latest security software; it is about everyone in the company taking responsibility for keeping data secure, whether it’s deleting emails with attachments from unknown sources or protecting the data on laptops that employees take home with them.

Board members could start by ensuring that cybersecurity is on the agenda at meetings. If these issues are delegated to senior management, then the board must have regular updates from those individuals to stay current on the topic.

Fiona Reynolds is chief executive of Principles for Responsible Investment.

conexust1f.flywheelstaging.comis the media partner for the PRI in Person, to be held in San Francisco next week.

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

The “CalPERS effect” on targeted company share prices

CalPERS’ approach to improving portfolio returns by engaging management of poorly performing companies to rethink governance and strategy has had a substantial endorsement, with analysis by Wilshire Associates demonstrating that the fund has had a dramatic effect on the performance of the companies placed on its Focus List. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

NYC pension funds divest from Iran

The five New York City pension funds selling shares worth $10.8 million in two companies with business ties to Iran have been asked to adopt resolutions for the phased divestment of holdings in eight more companies with ties to the country which, in total, have a market value of more than $141 million. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

South African investors embrace ESG

A group of South African investors, led by the country’s largest pension fund, the R711.15 billion (US$89 billion) Government Employees Pension Fund, have launched an investor network as part of their commitment to the United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI). Amanda White examines the ambitions of the network in changing the investment landscape in

ESG in emerging markets comes of age

Gaining Ground is a report by Mercer, in conjunction with the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation, examining the integration of environmental, social and governance factors into investment processes in emerging markets. It includes the first ever rating on ESG practices in China, India, South Korea and Brazil. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

NZ Super better than average on UN PRI

The US$10 billion sovereign fund New Zealand Superannuation Fund (NZSF) has, in its typically transparent fashion, published a UN assessment of its adherence to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investing In Climate Change 2009

One year ago, we published Investing in Climate Change: An Asset Management Perspective. We argued that the growing investment opportunities in climate change were driven by long-term mega-trends that would continue into the foreseeable future. One year on, the absolute necessity to act now to mitigate and adapt to climate change is even more urgent,