NBIM calls for more listings

Norges Bank Investment Management would like to see an increase in the number of company listings and in a new research paper suggests more flexibility from exchanges and index providers could facilitate this.

The paper, The listings ecosystem – aligning incentives , examines the decline in the number of company listings and the concern this presents for investors.

It says that unintended consequences of regulations, lower capital needs, expansion of alternative funding sources, and changing market structure have been suggested as possible causes for this systematic decline.

The paper, which reflects Norges Bank Investment Management’s views, provides a framework that attempts to address this decline and proposes possible remedies that could be taken by the various stakeholders to encourage more listings.

The paper argues that at its core, the listing ecosystem needs to establish a new equilibrium to address the evolving conflicts of interest between founders, early investors, underwriters and future shareholders.

It proposes some practical steps that could be taken by brokers, exchanges and index providers.

Sponsored Content

One of the key findings is that given the demand from investors to access smaller and start-up companies, that exchanges develop new solutions in the form of new listing classes or alternative trading platforms, to enable smaller firms to go public at an earlier stage of their life cycle.

NBIM welcomes the idea of junior or secondary exchanges that aim to reduce barriers of entry for smaller firms. And that eligibility criteria, like trading liquidity and reporting frequency, could be relaxed at the early stages of new company’s listed life cycle.

It suggests that index providers could also be more relaxed and revisit their rules for inclusion.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

CalPERS prepares for market dislocation

CalPERS' CIO Ben Meng is preparing for a market dislocation by ensuring the $354 billion pension fund has enough dry powder on hand to take advantage of a drawdown. A liquidity management action plan is a top priority for the fund.

UK’s PIC sees strong renewables pipeline

The United Kingdom’s £31.4 billion ($39 billion) Pension Insurance Corporation, an insurance company specialising in securing the liabilities of defined benefit pension schemes, is growing its infrastructure allocation to renewables and student housing and pushing into new markets in the Ireland and Spain.

LPs failing engagement in private equity

Engagement and stewardship in private equity has been left out in the cold. This is strange for an asset class with high returns and where the foundation is already in place for the asset manager to act on behalf of the asset owner for strong engagement. Bob Eccles encourages more action.

Do mega private equity funds deliver?

Are private equity mega funds in a category by themselves? Cambridge Associate's Andrea Auerbach argues they are, but not for the reasons that investors may think.

Spain’s Caixa boosts risk off allocation

In an overhaul of investments impacting almost every asset class, Spain’s largest corporate pension fund, is looking to increase diversification and improve its ESG ratings. It’s decreased equities in favour of US government bonds as part of a strategy to protect the portfolio in a potential downturn, this strategy also includes tail risk hedging, currency hedging and slashing its hedge funds allocation.

Infra performance benchmarks wanting

The EDHECinfra/G20 survey of infrastructure benchmarking practices, which included representatives of 130 asset owners accounting for $10 trillion, has found that existing performance monitoring benchmarks are self-defeating for asset owners and managers. But improvement, in the form of a more representative, better defined benchmark, may be possible thanks to recent progress.

Previous