UN Pension Fund back on track after 2022, as low costs pay off

The United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund, UNJSPF, is clawing back 2022 losses with assets under management currently valued at $82 billion and the fund experiencing a positive return of 5 per cent so far this year.

Robust returns between 2019 and 2021 had swelled the UNJSPF portfolio by 30 per cent to a record high in its 75-year history to over $91.5 billion by the end of 2021. Come 2022, and the ravages of high inflation and ensuing high interest rates impacting the long-term value of bonds and equity, and assets under management had fallen 14 per cent by the end of the year, said Pedro Guazo, representative of the Secretary-General for the investments of the assets of the fund, speaking in a recent UNJSPF Global Town Hall.

Guazo predicted the fund would be back up to $90 billion assets under management in the next two to three years. UNJSPF targets a long- term return of 3.5 per cent and has a 20-year return of 5.35 per cent. Despite the plunge in AUM last year, Guazo said UNJSPF had retained its fully funded status.

“The market value of the assets is way higher than the liabilities,” he said.

Low costs and efficiency compared to peer funds are an important contributor to the portfolio’s health.

“We manage to get the same returns with costs 30 per cent lower than comparable peers,” Guazo said, attributing low costs to the fact around 82 per cent of the portfolio is managed internally.

Sponsored Content

Around 50 per cent of the portfolio is invested in public equity versus 30 per cent in fixed income. The bulk of the public market portfolios are managed internally apart from an externally managed small cap equity portfolio and a new allocation to corporate bonds.

The global equity allocation is divided into four teams – North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Global Emerging Markets – that follow a disciplined investment process, centred on equity screening, fundamental analysis, and frequent dialogue with corporate management teams. The focus is on high-quality companies able to generate stable cash flows, a return on investment above their cost of capital, and the ability to achieve sustainable and profitable growth.

In a recent change of strategy, UNJSPF introduced a new benchmark for fixed income that incorporates a corporate bond component, broadening the pension fund’s asset mix. UNJSPF uses external managers in the allocation as it continues to develop and strengthen in-house capabilities. Over time it expects that the internal fixed income team will progressively assume a larger management of the portfolio as resources and capabilities are added.

 Private markets

Externally managed private market allocations comprise private equity, real estate, and real assets. Strategy in real estate – the portfolio dates from 1971 – is focused on manager selection. UNJSPF invests in over 128 externally managed funds globally.

The allocation target is approximately 50 per cent core “open ended” funds and 50 per cent non-core “closed end” funds. Core funds are diversified by geography and property type, and non-core funds are diversified by vintage year, geography, property type and risk profile.

Real assets, primarily infrastructure but also timber, agriculture, and commodities, are also managed externally.

Infrastructure investment, first begun in 2011, is focused on moderate leverage, strong cash flow yield and a demonstrated track record of profitable realizations.

Private equity, launched in 2010, consists of a select number of externally managed funds and co-investments diversified by vintage year, private equity substrategy, sector and geography.

Leave a Comment

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

Jase Auby, TRS's celebrated CIO, explains why TPA doesn't fit with its culture; why community push back on data centres could turn out to be an investor advantage, and argues the case for continuing to invest in fossil fuels. Top1000funds.com sat down with the CIO in his Austin office for an all-encompassing conversation.

Sort content by

Allocators seek out new portfolio tools expecting higher inflation

Asset allocators are seeking new ways to optimise portfolios beyond using the historic mean variance tools in the face of higher and more volatile inflation expectations. That can mean moving from SAA to a TPA, which is often a challenging task, but a new context demands modern investment frameworks.

APG: Europe’s fragmented market and risk aversion dent opportunities

Ronald Wuijster, chief executive of APG Asset Management, argues that fragmented capital markets and risk aversion are crimping investment opportunities in Europe. But he still sees attractive deals in the quantum and biotechnology sectors.

Investors wrestle with Europe’s demographic time bomb

Sharply declining populations in Europe, as well as countries like South Korea and Japan, have dramatic implications for economic growth and investment opportunities. Investors at FIS Oxford were warned that as depopulation occurs in certain areas, highly skilled workers will leave, creating a loss of services and fuelling political instability.

Investors face ‘economic paradigm vacuum’ post-neoliberalism 

The global economy is running in a “paradigm vacuum” as the classical theories of marginal change, equilibrium and rational markets are breaking down. Amid the void, University of Oxford professor Eric Beinhocker said investors must seek new economic tools that reflect how the world actually works.  

Opportunities and pitfalls for LPs using AI in private markets

Asset owners have a wide selection of artificial intelligence tools that product providers tout as enhancements to their unlisted investment process, but leading private markets academic Ludovic Phalippou said the reality is not that simple. Not only can AI make mistakes, it can also be tricked.

How investors are balancing the risks of investing in defence

As European countries increase defence spending, allocators are weighing up the risk and opportunity of allocating more to the sector. For some, investing in defence sits relatively comfortably with stakeholders but for others, investing "in things that kill people" remains a highly controversial conversation. 

Previous