North Carolina to consider DC option

The trustees of the $65 billion North Carolina Retirement Systems will vote on whether to introduce a defined contribution plan when the board meets on Jannuary 20, one of the significant recommendations by the Future of Retirement Study Commission.

The Commission, which was created by the board of trustees and tasked with reviewing all major aspects of benefit design, has recommended the choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution plan for all current and future employees, and automatic enrolment in a supplemental DC plan for future hires.

The NCRS’ current defined benefit plan has been under some scrutiny, with its consultant Ennis Knupp recommending in June last year that it was in need of a formal asset liability study and that for the size and complexity of its investments, it was chronically under staffed.

Last financial year was the first in the fund’s history that the General Assembly did not make the full annual required contribution.

At the upcoming board meeting, trustees could either pass the motion requesting the General Assembly adopt some or all of the Commission’s recommendations, or make additional recommedations of its own, but the decision to make any changes to the pension system ultimately lies with the General Assembly.

If the commission’s recommendations are adopted, the state retirement system will manage and regulate the DC plan in conjunction with existing 401(k) or 457 accounts, which are provided by Prudential Retirement.

Sponsored Content

The commission did not recommend a financial services company for the vendor of the new plan, instead suggesting the state invite proposals.

The commission recommended the default investment for the DC plan should be a lifecycle or target date fund, while also suggesting it should have the same employer costs as the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) and the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS).

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

Investment staff at Ohio STRS lose bonuses to board infighting

The investment committee at the $94 billion State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has narrowly voted to block bonuses to investment staff.

Thames Water losses hold lessons on the importance of a comparative view

The travails of UK utility Thames Water highlights the importance of seeing infrastructure investment in the context of wider market or peer investments, rather than just focusing on the one asset.

New Jersey opens up to Next Gen managers

New Jersey already invests 18 per cent of its $11 billion private equity programme with emerging managers. Now it's rolling out its platform to Next Generation real estate and private credit managers too

CPP evolves total portfolio approach

Understanding the drivers of your portfolio risk and return, and then using that information to more dynamically adjust the portfolio, is one of the benefits of the total portfolio approach according to CPP's Manroop Jhooty, whose total fund management team is exploring whether to include emerging factors in portfolio design.

Australia’s Aware Super on VC and the pension investing purpose

The A$175 billion Aware Super’s CIO Damian Graham said its venture capital investment in tech unicorn Canva has been good value for money but "pretty unusual" in the scheme of things. He reflects on the asset class and the broader pension investing purpose.  

Stock / bond correlations top of mind for Wisconsin

The State of Wisconsin Investment Board is incorporating top-down macro analysis of the drivers of stock-bond correlations into its risk management, including to assess the potential of a secular shift in the stock-bond correlation.

Previous