AustralianSuper looks to dynamic allocations

The A$38 billion ($40bn) AustralianSuper fund has made an active decision not to engage in formal strategic rebalancing, instead looking to a dynamic allocation of assets, chief investment officer, Mark Delaney (pictured), explains.

In the past year the allocation of AustralianSuper’s assets to equities has fluctuated by 20 per cent, from the low 60 per cent range to the low 40s.

The fund looks at its asset allocation every month, forced to make an active decision just based on cashflow. Its contributions (because of the mandatory nature of the Australian pension system) are $266 million a month, about 10 per cent a year.

“So we can move the portfolio just by allocating cashflow,” chief investment officer, Mark Delaney, says. “But we don’t believe in long-term strategic asset allocation set-and-forget.”

The fund conducts a strategic asset allocation review each year, which is about setting a target on where it wants to get to at the end of the financial year (June year-end).

That was set at 54 per cent in listed equities but the dynamic nature of the allocations is reflected in the fact that has now increased to 57 per cent based on the outlook for equities improving.

Sponsored Content

“We are about building long-run retirement savings, and can’t do that without growth assets. How we control volatility is the thing we focus on. We have a lot of diversification and unlisted is a big part of that. We also try to actively manage our equities exposure to reduce it in periods of higher risk/volatility in markets.”

Australian Super was an early adopter of infrastructure investing, and now also has a significant exposure to the asset class offshore.

“These businesses are large-scale, low beta, very steady business and revenue flows, and low-growth. They are often long-term contractual arrangements with high revenue and don’t require management ability to change the outcome of the business. The only risk you have is paying too much or over gearing, which has been the experience of many investors.”

AustralianSuper has some specific characteristics it screens for in infrastructure:

  • A strong competitive position
  • Good physical infrastructure that does not need a lot of money
  • Volume growth
  • Contracted rather than price-taking revenue streams
  • Affordable price and not excessive gearing

 

By their nature, Delaney says infrastructure characteristics are more palatable in a developed than an emerging market. This was supported by a study on China property and infrastructure the fund did about 18 months ago.

“Prices are not particularly cheap. You are betting on the China growth story and we thought we would play that through listed assets,” he says.

Expansion into Asia is one of the fund’s strategic investment themes.

It has separate emerging markets mandates, and Asia makes up about half of this exposure, as well as incorporating it into global equities. Delaney says he is looking to hire an Asian strategist, who will bring a macro overview to the fund, with individual asset class skills to supplement that.

It has undergone some recent staff changes, with the fund recently hiring a new head of infrastructure and is close to filling the head of equities position.

There are currently 30 internal investment staff but Delaney is “rethinking” the fund’s resourcing.

“As the fund has grown in the past 10 years the amount and type of resourcing has been changing. We are looking at the framework we need for if we double in size in the next five years. What’s the framework we need if we are an $80 billion fund. It takes a few years to get people to be adding value to the portfolio.”

AustralianSuper has 16 investment options, and the balanced fund is the default.

The strategic asset allocation of the balanced option is:

Australian shares 45 per cent; international shares 20 per cent; direct property 12 per cent; private equity 4 per cent; fixed interest 11 per cent; infrastructure 14 per cent; absolute return strategies 0 per cent; and cash 5 per cent.

 

Asset Owner:AustralianSuper

One response to “AustralianSuper looks to dynamic allocations”

  1. This makes perfect sense. Investment decision need to be re-assessed from time to time especially in this changing world now. This is the active monitoring system that we should learn in Hong Kong MPF system.

Leave a Comment

PGGM: Impact begins at home

PGGM: Impact begins at home

PGGM is preparing to build out the third element to its impact strategy targeting biodiversity. By focusing on food and the circular economy, PGGM aims to create most impact at home. Top1000funds.com looks at the fund's impact journey.

Sort content by

Arizona ups equity, adjusts pacing on overweight private markets

Arizona State Retirement System will opportunistically increase both US and international public equity exposure in line with its moderately bullish view on public equities and a new strategic asset allocation that targets 44 per cent of AUM in the asset class.

IMCO explains its key criteria when it comes to investing outside Canada

Canadian investor IMCO lays out compelling arguments to invest overseas but warns that a country's GDP growth does not equate to returns and tends to avoid emerging and frontier markets because of heightened geopolitical and currency risk.

UTIMCO gets ready for 2024

The endowment for two major Texan universities is hoping for a soft economic landing but planning for a recession. It is honing a playbook that ensures ongoing liquidity to make distributions, is not over its skis in terms of capital calls and commitments and has the firepower to invest in.

How Denmark’s Industriens is exploring AI to overhaul risk analysis

Industriens, the DKK 217 billion ($30.6 billion) Danish pension fund, is using advanced technology and exploring AI models to bring sweeping advantages to its risk management processes. Julia Sommer Legaard, investment risk and data manager at the fund for the last year, explains the process behind the innovation.

Norway’s GPFG argues the case for private equity – again

NBIM has petitioned politicians to let it invest in private equity - again. Arguing for a 3-5 per cent allocation with large managers in developed markets, NBIM recognises it will be unable to cap fees like in its other allocations and will curb costs by developing a co-investment program.

Behind CalSTRS’ cost savings: Better returns and control of risks

CalSTRS has saved more than $1.6 billion in costs since 2017 thanks to its collaborative model approach, which brings more assets in-house and encourages the use of different investment vehicles. Now it’s looking to measure the other benefits including boosted returns and more control over risks.

Previous