Markets remain fragile

A risk management strategy that measures the resilience and fragility of markets, protected portfolios from the wild February downswing in equity markets and predicts there is more potential weakness to come.

Windham Capital, a Boston-based risk management firm and a founding partner of State Street Associates, looks at the world according to a proprietary investment risk cycle, which describes how financial turbulence and systemic risk interact with each other and how that impacts asset values.

This measure of systemic risk helps separate a fragile market from a resilient one and while it doesn’t tell you about an individual tail-risk event, it can indicate when one may be approaching so portfolios can be positioned to cushion the blow. Similarly, if the systemic risk measures shows that markets are resilient, portfolios can take advantage of that.

Chief executive of Windham and a professor of finance at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mark Kritzman, says implied systemic risk, or the absorption ratio, is a measure of how tightly coupled or unified the markets are.

This absorption ratio, or concentrated risk measure, was developed in response to the global financial crisis, but the most recent market activity is the first time it has had a chance to really shine since then.

“We came up with absorption ratio as a result of the financial crisis, to measure systemic risk and back tested it through the GFC,” Kritzman says. “Since then we have seen only one drawdown greater than 10 per cent, this is the first live test. Our expectation is it will provide the most value in large sell offs by helping investors to avoid those sell offs.”

Sponsored Content

Combining the absorption ratio with a measure of financial turbulence or risk similarity, which looks at how unusual the market is compared to historical norms, provides an index of market fragility versus resilience.

Using a measure of zero to 100, the index hit 48 the day the market peaked on February 19. By February 24, it was at 64 and jumped to 76 the following day. This triggered a shift into what Kritzman calls a fragile environment. Two days later it measured 99 and has been there ever since.

“This is the fastest increase we have ever seen, including in our back testing,” Kritzman said.

As a result, Windham quickly moved client portfolios into their most defensive posture, taking into account their different governance requirements, and helped protect against a large part of the market decline.

“The sell off since the peak in February was 21 per cent,” Kritzman says. “Since the indicator moved into the fragile regime on February 25, the market has been down 18 per cent. So, we were in the most defensive position for clients for a large part of the sell-off. This indicator is not going to pick the peak but it did a good job of giving an exit signal early in the sell off.”

“For some clients neutral is 70:30, for others it is 50:50, and some clients only allow movement within narrow bands,” he says. “As soon as the indicator showed that markets had transitioned into that fragile state, we moved all clients into their most defensive position within their guidelines. For one of them that was 0 per cent in equities.”

One response to “Markets remain fragile”

  1. James G. Lee, PhD, CFA, FRM

    Amanda, thanks for reporting Prof. Mark Kritzman’s cutting-edge work! I am reading their 2017 book, “A Practitioner’s Guide to Asset Allocation”, include chapter 16: Regime Shifts. To my understanding, there are three models/indicators: 1) Regime Shifts thru Hidden Markov Model, 2) Absorption Ratio, and 3) Financial Turbulence. With the high volatility of equity markets as we we have been experiencing since last week, I am wondering what their models/indicators are telling us this time? Also, what are the advantages of these models/indicators over implied volatilities (e.g., VXN for QQQ, VIX for SPY)? Would these three models/indicators provide earlier warnings and/or more accurate signals about upcoming market turbulence? If yes, how many days do these models expect the market turbulence to last this time? Thanks! James Lee, PhD, CFA

Leave a Comment

Long Covid for the global economy

Long Covid for the global economy

Prevention is the balm for global economic shock, says respected central bank adviser Professor Warwick McKibbin who says the world’s economic future is uncertain and inflation is likely to remain under a persistent pandemic.

Sort content by

Long-term approach needed more than ever

Chief investment officer of the world’s largest pension fund the $1.5 trillion GPIF, Hiro Mizuno, says large institutional investors must stay calm and maintain their long term investment course. He told Top1000funds.com that “long term investment is needed more than ever before”.

Leadership under challenge

Evolving culture and leadership to respond to the challenges in a crisis are a key source of resilience and can lead to positivity of mindset and action.

Fed’s open ended move not enough

The US Federal Reserve’s decision to make its treasury bond-buying program open-ended will not be enough to ease the  extreme liquidity crisis despite Wall Street rallying on the news, according to Campbell Harvey, finance professor at Duke University.

Emerging markets vulnerable

Investors have pulled $83 billion from emerging markets since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, the largest capital outflow ever recorded, and the IMF and the World Bank are calling on G20 countries to show relief in dealing with their emerging market counterparts.

CIOs ride the corona storm

Even for long term investors who pride themselves on the big picture and horizons stretching far into the future, the unprecedented change of recent weeks is hair-raising. Enough liquidity on hand to take advantage of buying opportunities once they arise and comfortably pay benefits is crucial. We look at the strategies of investors around the world in response to the market conditions.

Coronavirus could trigger credit crisis

A former adviser to the US Federal Reserve, Danielle DiMartino Booth, said increased volatility in bonds and turmoil in the money markets from the outbreak of the coronavirus could signal a looming credit event despite the Fed’s latest bid to inject liquidity into the system.

Previous