Winners emerge from crowded field in UN PRI race

Six candidates have gained election to the advisory council of the UN PRI in a close-fought election that for the first time saw asset managers and service providers included.

There was strong interest in the elections for The Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative (PRI) Advisory Council, with more than 31 non-asset owner candidates for four positions and six asset owners for two positions.

It is understood more than 500 of the 920 signatories voted. Chief executive of investments at Dutch fund PFZW, Else Bos, and CalPERS board of administration member, Priya Sara Mathur, were the two asset owners elected to the 16-person council.

Aviva Investors UK chief executive, Paul Abberley, and Santander Asset Management Brazil, chief executive Luciane Ribeiro, were the two asset managers elected to the board.

Service providers won the remaining two places for non-asset owners. Responsible research director, Melissa Brown, and Australian Council of Superannuation Investors chief executive, Ann Byrne, were elected.

Under the rules governing regional representation on the council, Sopawadee Lertmanaschai from the Government Pension Fund of Thailand, John Oliphant from the Government Employers Pension Fund of South Africa, and Rene Sanda from Brazilian pension fund PREVI were automatically selected.

Sponsored Content

The PRI initiative was establish in 2006 and aims to promote responsible investment and ESG best practice.

Signatories agree to a voluntary set of six principles aimed at encouraging the incorporation of ESG aims into their organisations and the investment industry more broadly.

The PRI Advisory Council has been expanded to 16 positions drawn from the global signatory base.

It includes two UN representatives, nine asset owners from Europe, North America, Asia, Oceania, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. For the first time two investment managers and two service providers were included on the panel.

“The new governance structure marks a significant change for PRI, one that will benefit from the diverse representation of our asset owner, investment manager and service partner signatories in helping PRI realise its goals,” newly elected PRI Advisory Council Chair, Wolfgang Engshuber said.

One of two Australian representatives on the council, Bryne, who heads ACSI – a governance advisory organisation for the Australian superannuation industry – said she was focused on improving the practical focus of PRI and increasing its US membership.

“For us there are a couple of concerns and one is to make sure that the PRI is practically focused at implementing the principles and provides as much assistance as possible to its members,” Bryne said.

“But (it) does that in a practical way and shows an understanding of investment management processes and pension fund processes. The other big issue for the PRI is to increase the membership from the United States, there are so many assets in the US but there are not enough signatories who are focused on PRI principles in the US.”

US-based signatories to the UN PRI comprise of 19 asset owners, 83 asset managers and 27 service providers. This represents 14 per cent of signatories.

Overall 235 asset owners are signatories, 522 asset managers and 163 service providers.

Bryne said she also was focused on ensuring that the UN PRI was working appropriately with emerging market investors and asset managers.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous