Wilshire paints dire picture for state retirement systems

Wilshire Consulting’s annual report on US state retirement systems reveals near-universal underfunding, leavened only slightly by the 19.5 per cent rally in global equity markets in the eight months since its cut-off date.


Of the 57 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data to June 30, 2009, every single one had a market value of assets less than their pension liabilities. The average of these underfunded plans had a ratio of assets-to-liabilities of just 58 per cent.

Wilshire estimated that the pension asset-to-liabilities ratio of all 125 state pension plans in its survey was 65 per cent in 2009, down “sharply” from an estimated 85 per cent in 2008.

However the consultancy stressed that the lag caused by the time it took actuaries to calculate a plan’s liabilities made the situation look worse than it would now be.

“It is important to view the latest published funding ratios in the context of depressed market levels as of June 30, 2009. Since then, global equity markets have rallied 19.5 per cent in the eight months through February 26, 2010, which we would expect to result in higher funding ratios today if the funding data were available in real-time.”

A gradual reduction in the state systems’ home country bias was affirmed by the Wilshire report.

Sponsored Content

During the last nine years, the average allocation to non-US equities increased from 13 per cent to 18.2 per cent, while allocations to US bonds decreased from 31 per cent to 27.1 per cent.

Average allocation to both real estate and private equity increased slightly. An average 4 per cent allocation to real estate in 2000 rose to 6.5 per cent across the 125 plans by 2009, while the average private equity exposure more than doubled from 3 per cent to 7.4 per cent.

“As expected, the increased allocation to equities and away from debt from 2000 to 2009 has caused the average state pension plan to move towards a slightly higher expected return and risk allocation along the efficient frontier,” the Wilshire report authors wrote.

“Increased allocations to real estate and private equity from 2004 to 2009 provided slightly increased return and lower risk for the average state plan.”

Wilshire found that the median state pension fund had an expected long-term return of 6.9 per cent, which is 1.1 per cent less than the current median actuarial interest rate used to determine ongoing liabilities.

“Under Wilshire’s return forecasts, none of the 125 state retirement systems are expected to earn long-term asset returns that equal or exceed their actuarial interest rate assumption. This is a dramatic change compared to the 23 state retirement systems that were expected to earn long-term returns that equalled or exceeded their actuarial interest rate assumption in last year’s report,” the authors wrote.

The report did point out that Wilshire’s assumed returns for each asset class gave no consideration to the potential value added by successful active management.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous