Wilshire paints dire picture for state retirement systems

Wilshire Consulting’s annual report on US state retirement systems reveals near-universal underfunding, leavened only slightly by the 19.5 per cent rally in global equity markets in the eight months since its cut-off date.


Of the 57 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data to June 30, 2009, every single one had a market value of assets less than their pension liabilities. The average of these underfunded plans had a ratio of assets-to-liabilities of just 58 per cent.

Wilshire estimated that the pension asset-to-liabilities ratio of all 125 state pension plans in its survey was 65 per cent in 2009, down “sharply” from an estimated 85 per cent in 2008.

However the consultancy stressed that the lag caused by the time it took actuaries to calculate a plan’s liabilities made the situation look worse than it would now be.

“It is important to view the latest published funding ratios in the context of depressed market levels as of June 30, 2009. Since then, global equity markets have rallied 19.5 per cent in the eight months through February 26, 2010, which we would expect to result in higher funding ratios today if the funding data were available in real-time.”

A gradual reduction in the state systems’ home country bias was affirmed by the Wilshire report.

Sponsored Content

During the last nine years, the average allocation to non-US equities increased from 13 per cent to 18.2 per cent, while allocations to US bonds decreased from 31 per cent to 27.1 per cent.

Average allocation to both real estate and private equity increased slightly. An average 4 per cent allocation to real estate in 2000 rose to 6.5 per cent across the 125 plans by 2009, while the average private equity exposure more than doubled from 3 per cent to 7.4 per cent.

“As expected, the increased allocation to equities and away from debt from 2000 to 2009 has caused the average state pension plan to move towards a slightly higher expected return and risk allocation along the efficient frontier,” the Wilshire report authors wrote.

“Increased allocations to real estate and private equity from 2004 to 2009 provided slightly increased return and lower risk for the average state plan.”

Wilshire found that the median state pension fund had an expected long-term return of 6.9 per cent, which is 1.1 per cent less than the current median actuarial interest rate used to determine ongoing liabilities.

“Under Wilshire’s return forecasts, none of the 125 state retirement systems are expected to earn long-term asset returns that equal or exceed their actuarial interest rate assumption. This is a dramatic change compared to the 23 state retirement systems that were expected to earn long-term returns that equalled or exceeded their actuarial interest rate assumption in last year’s report,” the authors wrote.

The report did point out that Wilshire’s assumed returns for each asset class gave no consideration to the potential value added by successful active management.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous