US endowments interested in outsourcing to multi-managers

A significant proportion of US endowments and other non-profit funds are at least “moderately interested” in outsourcing their investment management to a multi-manager model in the wake of the global financial crisis, according to a new survey by SEI Investments Company.The survey results, published last week in the US, show that the non-profit sector of the institutional investment market has some unique challenges and concerns when compared with pension funds and other institutional investors.

Most, for instance, have concrete spending programs requiring at least 4-5 per cent a year of total investment assets to maintain their sponsoring organizations’ commitments.

The survey, of 177 executives overseeing asset pools ranging between $25 million and more than $1 billion – with just over 50 per cent between $50 -300 million – showed that the major concerns going forward were:

  • making asset allocation decisions in conjunction with organizational finance decisions (62 per cent)
  • maintaining appropriate liquidity in the investment portfolio (49 per cent)
  • ongoing cash management (44 per cent), and
  • inflation hedging (44 per cent).

Only 28 per cent of respondents said they had immunized a portion of their portfolios to better support spending policies and avoid liquidity challenges. But another 23 per cent said they were considering introducing such a program.

SEI, which offers both traditional asset consulting services and multi-manager products, asked the non-profits, none of whom were clients, to define their investment governance according to one-of-three models: 56 per cent said they had an asset consultant to assist internal professionals on manager selection and oversight; 31 per cent said they had an internal team, without a consultant, to choose and oversee all managers and investments; and 13 per cent they had outsourced the CIO function to a multi-manager.

The SEI report notes that several high-profile firms have recently been offering their multi-manager services, specifically to the non-profit sector as an alternative to using an asset consultant. The researchers therefore asked the organisations which use an asset consultant about their intentions. A total of 54 per cent said they had “ at least a moderate level of interest in better understanding the benefits of an outsourced approach”.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous