UniSuper’s specialist revolution for global equities

Global equitiesThe A$25 billion ($21 billion) UniSuper is revolutionising its $4 billion international equities portfolio, terminating every active developed markets manager in favour of passively tracking the MSCI World, while alpha is sought among specialist regional and sectoral managers, with a listed technology mandate to be first cab off the rank.

The chief investment officer of UniSuper, John Pearce, said the overhaul had been in progress over several months, given the volume of assets involved.

“This move is not an argument for passive management: myself and my team here are big believers in active management. It’s just a question of where will the allocation of our research time to find the best active managers yield the best results,” Pearce said.

“And at this stage, we don’t believe that’s in developed-market equities mandates.”

About 10 such mandates have been terminated by UniSuper over the course of 2010, with the money sitting passively for now,  awaiting a risk budget re-allocation which will seek more specialist exposures to regions or sectors where Pearce’s team believes there is value to be added.

A specialist technology manager is currently being sought, with Pearce reasoning that this was a natural area of underweight for Australian investors given the market’s scarcity of technology stocks.

Sponsored Content

UniSuper has maintained its existing active emerging markets mandates, meaning houses such as GMO, Mondrian and Treasury Asia Asset Management continue to run money for the big industry fund.

Asset Owner:UniSuper

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous