The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds

The world’s largest institutional investors are increasingly building their own home-region private equity programs, but turning to fund-of-funds for the rest of the world particularly when it comes to Asia, says a Hong Kong-based partner of the first fund-of funds to ever build a product covering that region.

Sally Collier, who recently moved to Hong Kong as a partner of Pantheon Private Equity, said the “mega buy-out” managers who enjoyed a heyday in 2006-7 often had global presences, large capacity and were relatively accessible for researchers.

However, those managers were “no longer flavour of the month”, and demand had now shifted to the less-leveraged players in the middle market.

“The challenge here is that these players might only be raising $1.5 to 2 billion per fund, and they are becoming oversubscribed,” Collier said. “They’re the ones that take serious resources to find and access.”

Many of these “growth-oriented” mid-market private equity general partners were popping up in China and India, Collier said, where there was really no buy-out market to speak of.

Pantheon launched its first Asian private equity fund-of-funds in 1994, and raised its last one in 2006, closing it at $800 million for the seven-year closed-end vehicle.

Sponsored Content

Collier defended the private equity practice of charging fees on committed capital before it was invested, saying that to do otherwise would encourage general partners to make deals no matter what.

“As 2007 progressed our managers slowed down on new investments, and it was that fee structure which allowed them to do that.”

The Pantheon partner did allow that more “fee discussions” were happening in the cost conscious age following the global financial crisis.

She cited the recent example of a Missouri-based institution bargaining a private equity manager into paying 80 per cent of transaction costs for deals made on its behalf, where the historical norm has been a 50:50 split between the general and limited partners.

One response to “The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds”

  1. It makes sense that funds of fund become a norm. It lower fees and ease of management will benefit investors.

    ifund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

AP2 appoints another new CIO

The SEK 204 billion ($28 billion) Second Swedish National Pension Fund/AP2 has appointed its fourth chief investment officer in four years, as the fund reports its best annual return since inception. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

France’s SWF names manager selection committee

France’s €33 billion Sovereign Wealth Fund, the Fonds de Reserve Pour Les Retraites, has made four appointments to its independent manager selection committee tasked with reviewing all mandate bids by funds managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Climate change expert upbeat on post-Copenhagen opportunities

Global head of climate change investment research at DB Climate Change Advisors, Mark Fulton, has a contrary view to most observers, post-Copenhagen. He spoke to Amanda White about the climate change market and the asset allocation implications for investors. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP’s split portfolio

The performance of the hedging portfolio and a 43 per cent allocation to interest-rate sensitive bonds in the investment beta portfolio of the DKK352 billion ($65 billion) ATP were the main contributors to the group increasing pension reserves by one third last year. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Ibbotson reveals the ABCs – alphas, betas and costs – of hedge funds

Hedge funds, in aggregate, have generated positive alpha in the past 11 years. This finding, made by Roger Ibbotson, founder of Ibbotson Associates and Professor of Finance at Yale University, proves the strategies can resist powerful market declines but often fall short of providing absolute returns to investors. He spoke with Simon Mumme about the

CalPERS rates reputational risk above investments

Risk to reputation is more important than risk to investments according to a survey of internal staff at CalPERS completed as part of its governance/risk management initiative. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous