Russell takes up fundamental index for alternative beta series

Rob Arnott
Rob Arnott

Alternative beta is catching on, with Russell Investments the latest market index builder to embrace the non-cap-weighted index trend by inking a deal with Rob Arnott’s Research Affiliates company.

Russell will launch a series of “fundamental” indices, in association with Research Affiliates, during the third quarter of this year.

Fundamental indices rank stocks according to a range of factors which the strength of the underlying businesses rather than the price multiple of all their shares (capitalisation value). Critics have suggested that it is a form of value-biased index but Research Affiliates say that more factors are assessed than price:earnings figures.

Arnott, the founder and chair of Research Affiliates, said that about US$50 billion in assets were being managed using fundamental indices around the world.

Russell’s Ron Bundy, the managing director for indices, said the firm would continue to believe that cap-weighted indices represented the best description of the market’s opportunity set and therefore the most appropriate benchmarks for investors.

However he noted the increasing demand from index investors for a “more active” approach using alternative beta.

Sponsored Content

The big quant index houses, State Street Global Advisors and Barclays Global Investors (now BlackRock), have provided various bespoke and packaged indices in recent years.

SSgA, for instance, has a “diversified” index strategy which combines low-volatility with value and size tilts.

Russell, which is best known for its multi-manager funds and asset consulting, pioneered the development of growth and value indices in the US in the 1980s. The first index in the new series is likely to be a global equities index.

Research Affiliates, based in Newport, California, also provides a range of investment services from direct asset management and sub-advisory services to licensing agreements.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous