Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.

 

In an article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, authors Jagdeep Singh Baccher, Leo de Bever, Roman Chuyan and Ashby Monk, outline the history of the organisation’s investment performance attribution system, which was essentially a decomposition of the total value added in the prescribed “allocation” and “selection” buckets.

The new decision-based attribution system was designed to mirror the way AimCo actually makes investment decisions.

This includes which agents in the ecosystem are adding value – from the chief investment officer in asset allocation decision making, to the heads of assets classes making decisions about various markets within asset classes, and portfolio managers and analysts making decisions about specific stocks and bonds.

In addition to tactical asset allocation decisions, the new system also considers opportunistic decisions that don’t fit within an asset class.

Sponsored Content

As outlined in the article, the authors say the new decision-based attribution system has materially improved AimCo’s ability to understand the relationship between investment decisions and investment results.

This is particularly important given that performance attribution should not just explain the past, but be a tool to make better future investment decisions.

 

The full article can be accessed below

Rethinking Investment Performance Attribution

 

Jagdeep Singh Bachher was executive vice-president at AimCo when the article was written, he is now the chief investment officer of the University of California

Leo de Bever is chief executive of AimCo

Roman Chuyan is president and chief investment officer at Model Capital Management

Ashby Monk is executive director of Stanford University’s Global Projects Center

Asset Owner:AIMCo

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Holland’s hybrid: defined ambition

Jan Tamerus, actuary director at PGGM, was instrumental in developing the new Dutch pension defined-ambition structure. Back in 2006, he was involved in looking at the sustainability of the defined benefit system and in concluding it was not in fact sustainable, the idea of defined ambition evolved. One of the key reasons for not going

Previous