Real estate and infrastructure shine in private markets

Real estate and infrastructure are attractive investments in the private markets space, but individual investment selection has become more important in private equity and debt, according to the latest major analysis by global private markets investment management firm Partners Group.

The analysis, part of a six-monthly series, continues to favour emerging markets, on a geographical split, as being best positioned for the post-crisis global economy.

Partners Group says: “Over the past six months there has been considerable speculation as to the directional movement of the real estate markets. For the next 12 to 18 months (the firm) has a strong conviction that the tide not only is coming in, it is coming in far faster than many believe.

“Investors’ salient questions are: ‘where will new capital invest in real estate?’, ‘what are the opportunities?’ and ‘where can the savvy investor find the best risk-adjusted returns?’

Nori Lietz, partner and chief strategist for private real estate at Partners Group, says: “We think the herd mentality will cause many investors to invest in core ‘trophy’ properties. Our view is that more sophisticated investors will search for those opportunities which remain capital constrained, including investments in secondaries, debt recapitalizations and emerging market real estate.”

The report says there is an estimated $ 180 billion of dry powder for private real estate investment after the “window shopping” of the past three years, and that this may be an understatement. Notwithstanding the abundant capital available for trophy assets (such as large new or landmark office blocks), little is presently available for distressed situations.

Sponsored Content

Geographically for real estate, Partners Group currently favours emerging markets, especially Brazil, over Europe and then North America.

In unlisted infrastructure, entry valuations are very important because it is a classic value asset class. This is because there are usually only a limited number of operational levers which can compensate if a high entry price is paid.

Michael Barben, partner and head of private infrastructure at  Partners Group, says: “The relative scarcity of capital in the infrastructure space consequently offers today’s investor the advantage of attractive valuations and limited competition for transactions.”

The report notes that the infrastructure market seems to be moving away from the “captive” or “sponsored” funds, which may have perceived conflicts of interests, and towards the specialist managers.

With respect to private equity and debt, timing is very important and the current cycle makes investment selection of paramount importance.

The report says the industry currently has an estimated $400 billion of dry powder for equity in buyouts and some managers will be pressured to invest because of the low level of activity of the past two years. Pricing on transactions has bounced back, particularly at the big end. The firm sees better opportunities among small-medium-sized companies. It also currently favours direct investments over primary funds and the secondaries market.

Similarly with private debt, the firm is focusing more on direct investments as the low-hanging fruit from distressed sellers has already been picked. However, the positive outlook for private debt lenders in general is supported by less competition, particularly from the banks, but also from some managers being unable to raise capital.

“Over the past two years, fund-raising has become more difficult,” the report says. “Only high-quality funds that managed to generate strong track records throughout the crisis are able to come back to the market.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous