Pensions embrace short-term caution

Large pension funds around the globe are being cautious in current markets and are looking to “batten down the hatches”, a panel of investors told delegates at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles last week.

Vicki Fuller, chief investment officer of the $209 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, said the fund is mostly an equity investor, with more than 50 per cent in that asset class. It also has about 30 per cent in alternatives and the rest in fixed income.

“We continue to invest because we have to but we try not to be too cute,” Fuller said. “We are too large to move to 50/50 fixed income and equities, but if I could, maybe I would. Now we look to batten down the hatches and look for information that will inform the next downturn.”

Similarly, the $222 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System is staying close to its investment targets; for example, its global equities target is 54 per cent and it is allocating 53.7 per cent, and in fixed income it has invested 12.37 per cent against its 13 per cent target.

“We think the world looks like goldilocks – not too hot and not too cold,” CalSTRS CIO Chris Ailman said. “Last week, all the investment staff met, and we didn’t see anything too cheap, so are staying close to our investment targets; if anything, taking a bit of risk off. We are long term and we’re looking out 30 years. Ours is a very mature pension fund, and [has] negative cash flow, so we can afford [to have] only about one-third of the portfolio in unlisted, and we are finding they are priced to perfection.”

Fuller and Ailman spoke at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles last week.

Sponsored Content

They were joined on a panel titled “Long-term value in a short-term world” by Nick Moakes, CIO of the $33 billion Wellcome Trust.

The trust, which spends $1 billion each year funding medical research, doesn’t have a long tail of liabilities, so doesn’t have to own fixed income, but it did recently issue a 100-year bond.

“Our view is everything in fixed income is overpriced,” Moakes told conference attendees. “We’re more focused on cash flows, rather than the price that the market is putting on that.”

Wellcome, like CalSTRS and New York Common, is a true long-term investor and is focusing on companies that have sustainable business models.

“We don’t define it as ESG but as a [company’s] licence to operate,” Moakes said. “We look at how they treat suppliers, customers and employees.”

In a tribute to this process, the fund hasn’t sold a portfolio company for five years.

“We have had zero portfolio turnover,” Moakes said.

He and Ailman are both passionate about influencing public companies to invest more sustainably, and focus more on the long term.

“I am a paid up member of the club to abandon quarterly earnings,” Moakes said. “Some companies, for example Unilever, are doing it, and it’s had zero impact on their share price.”

Similarly, Ailman is working with other investors to steer companies towards information that long-term investors need and want.

“What I want is more forward-looking information,” Ailman said. “It’s not about 90 days, anything in life that is worthwhile is longer than 90 days. I need to invest members’ money for 60 years. I need a long-term perspective and I need companies we invest in to think longer term, almost multi-generational. You’re a bank today, will you be a bank in the future? We will continue to hold your stock, so do us a favour and think long term.”

All of the investors on the panel agreed that divestment was not a strategy they thought worked. Instead, they preferred to hold a seat at the table to change behaviour.

“For many of us that are large, we don’t have a concentrated portfolio and hold the markets as a unit,” Ailman explained. “Divestment has not brought about change. Now we are asking universities to start researching what has brought about change.”

New York Common’s Fuller said engagement is the catalyst.

“There are a whole host of issues on the ‘social’ side; [for example] around guns or prisons,” she said. “If we divest from, say, guns, what do you do about the stores that sell the guns? We don’t change the equation at all. Engagement is key.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous