NYSTRS has stellar year

The $89.9 billion New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has achieved its best result for 25 years, returning 23.2 per cent for the year to June 30, 2011, with the strong performance driven mainly by its equity portfolio.

NYSTRS, which claims to be one of the few fully-funded public pension funds in the country, reported that its stellar year increased the value of its assets by a further $13 billion.

The latest financial-year result is nearly double the fund’s return of 12.1 per cent in the previous financial year.

NYSTRS’ five-year return is 4.2 per cent a year, and over 25 years it has returned 9 per cent a year, 100 basis points more than its long-term actuarially-assumed rate of return of 8 per cent.

The president of the fund, Michael Kraus, a 20-year veteran of the board, says the fund’s strong position was due in part to the continued contributions from both members and employers.

“Public pension funding is a shared responsibility and we would not be where we are without consistent, uninterrupted employer and member contributions,” he said in his annual message to members.

Sponsored Content

“In New York we are fortunate to have a funding framework that values contributions on time and in the full amount. States that have taken ‘pension holidays’ or made reduced contributions are now dealing with the devastating effects of these decisions in the form of under-funded plans.”

Over the past two years the fund has pared back its losses from the global financial crisis, when it lost 20.5 per cent in 2009 and 6.3 per cent in 2008.

Its public equities portfolio was the engine room of performance, and represents more than 58.5 per cent of the fund, or $53.4 billion.

Domestic equities are predominantly internally run, with 95 per cent of its holdings in what its investment team describes as “several low-risk strategies targeting broad US market exposure”.

The remaining 5 per cent is allocated to external managers seeking above-benchmark returns.

Its domestic equities portfolio generated a return of 31.7 per cent, versus the S&P 1500 index return of 31.6 per cent.

“The portfolio benefited from excess returns to growth and value strategies internally managed by system staff,” the fund’s investment team told members in its annual report.

“The system’s external managers also contributed excess returns, partly from exposure to small and mid-capitalisation stocks.”

The fund has a target to reduce its domestic equity holdings from their current level of 45.3 per cent of the portfolio to 42 per cent.

Over the course of the year the fund raised more than $4 billion from domestic equities, reallocating the cash either to international equities to fund new external managers, or to short-term fixed income investments.

It plans to lift its international equity holdings, which are mostly in developed markets, from 13.2 per cent to 15 per cent of the portfolio.

In 2009 the fund decided to restructure its international equities portfolio, with 25 per cent to be actively managed and measured against an MSCI ACWI Ex-US benchmark.

It also has plans to increase its exposures to domestic fixed income from 13.9 per cent to 18 per cent; and to mortgages, which combine both conventional and federal housing administration mortgages, from 6.1 per cent to 8 per cent.

Other strong performing assets for the fund included its real estate investments.

The fund’s REITs returned 33.6 per cent for the domestic portfolio and 31.2 per cent for the ex-US portfolio.

Its directly-owned real estate assets, and a combination of opportunistic funds and value-added real estate funds, achieved 23.7 per cent and 31.9 per cent respectively.

The fund has a 7 per cent target allocation to private equity and as of June 30 had 8.2 per cent of its portfolio invested in this asset class.

NYSTRS’ private equity portfolio outperformed its benchmark on a five and 10-year basis with a performance of 9.6 per cent and 10.5 per cent above a comparable benchmark performance of 7.9 per cent and 7.7 per cent.

But over a shorter time frame the fund under-performed its benchmarks for private equity.

The one-year performance of 23.8 per cent lagged its benchmark performance of 35.7 per cent and the three-year average return of 2.6 per cent lagged the benchmark performance of 8.3 per cent.

“This is primarily attributable to greater volatility in public markets outpacing the revaluation in the private equity portfolio,” the investment team told its members.

Since the fund began its private equity program in 1984 it has generated an internal rate of return of 11.8 per cent.

For the 2010 calendar year the fund also looked to exercise its rights as shareholder voting on 16,607 proposals, representing 1963 meetings for the companies NYSTRS owns in its equity portfolio.

It voted with management proposals in 87 per cent of cases, voting against 12 per cent of the time and abstaining in 1 per cent of votes.

It rejected almost half of the 555 shareholder proposals it voted on.

“System policies generally support management if the position is reasonable, is not detrimental to the long-term economic prospects of the company and does not tend to diminish the rights of shareholders,” the fund said in its annual report.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Architect of Future Fund investment strategy resigns

A chief architect of the A$68 billion ($60 billion) Australian Future Fund‘s investment strategy will leave in two weeks to form a new business offering asset allocation and macroeconomic strategy advice to large fiduciary investors globally. Tony Day, who joined the Future Fund in its early days of 2007, said that at 44 years of

Process over performance

Using performance, even as a filter, to hire or fire funds managers is a dangerous game, according to head of the international division at Enhanced Investment Technologies (INTECH), David Schofield. Choosing any partner, whether personal or business, can be fraught with complexity, and the process of hiring and firing managers does not escape those selection

Hedge FoFs on the wane with experienced investors

Hedge funds have had a bad rap for a long time, often undeserved. But the global financial crisis coupled with the Madoff scandal has affected their growth. UK-based alternatives research firm Preqin surveyed 50 institutional investors about their investments with hedge funds and hedge funds of funds (FoFs). The demands of institutional investors following their

Be aware of absolute returns, because it’s a relative world

Is it possible for a human being to manage an absolute-returns fund? If you believe the latest behavioural finance research, it must be very difficult. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

How active management saved the UN

The $32 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund has outperformed due to a commitment to active management, a willingness to invest away from the trending market, and a realistic target return. (click on the photo for more…)mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UniSuper’s specialist revolution for global equities

The A$25 billion ($21 billion) UniSuper is revolutionising its $4 billion international equities portfolio, terminating every active developed markets manager in favour of passively tracking the MSCI World, while alpha is sought among specialist regional and sectoral managers, with a listed technology mandate to be first cab off the rank. The chief investment officer of

Previous