NYC pension funds divest from Iran

The five New York City pension funds selling shares worth $10.8 million in two companies with business ties to Iran have been asked to adopt resolutions for the phased divestment of holdings in eight more companies with ties to the country which, in total, have a market value of more than $141 million.

The recommendation came from New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson Jr, who said the decision was based on numerous events and factors, including “the Iranian government’s recent efforts to strengthen its nuclear weapons program and steal its presidential election”.

The two companies involved are Oil and Natural Gas Limited and PetroChina Company, and the sale is expected to result in an overall profit for the funds.

In addition, Thompson has recommended that the boards promptly adopt resolutions authorising the phased liquidation of investments in: Petrol Brasileiro, Samsung Engineering, Inpex, OMV, Sinopec, China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Wartsila and Repsol SA, all of which have significant ties to Iran.

This is consistent with the New York State Common Retirement Funds’ recent decision to divest from nine companies, five of which are listed above, and the actions taken by many other public pension systems.

Sponsored Content

In a statement, Congressman Anthony Weiner voiced his concerns about six other companies with ties to Iran, and urged the City funds to follow the lead of New York State and 15 other states that have divested from investments in companies doing business with Iran’s energy sector.

“Iran funds terrorism,” he said. “They send weapons and resources to attack Israel. If these businesses do not stop supporting countries blocking peace in the Middle East and advocating the annihilation of Jews on their own, then we’re going to crack down on them.”

Recently, Thompson urged US Congressman Barney Frank, chair of the financial services committee, to include in his “Iran Sanctions Enabling Act” provisions that would offer additional protections, including indemnification, for large investors such as the City pension funds that choose to sell shares in companies doing business with Iran.

Since November 2002, the Comptroller’s Office and pension funds have successfully persuaded six of America’s largest companies to sever their ties with nations that conduct business with Iran. These companies are: ConocoPhillips, Halliburton, Cooper Cameron, Aon, Foster Wheeler, and General Electric.

In 2005, the Office broadened its efforts and urged a number of companies to describe their policies and safeguards to mitigate the risks to their stock prices and reputations posed by their business ties to Iran.

The Comptroller is the investment adviser to and custodian for the five New York City pension funds: the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, the Teachers’ Retirement System for the City of New York, the New York City Police Pension Fund, the New York City Fire Department Fund and the New York City Board of Education Retirement System.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous