Norges Bank forges closer research links

Some of the brightest investment minds gathered recently in Oslo for the first Financial Research Conference, conducted by the asset management arm of Norway’s central bank.

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) chief executive Yngve Slyngstad (pictured) told the attendees that the conference was part of a broader engagement with finance academics to “bridge the gap between the world of academic finance and the world of investment professionals”.

As part of this effort, the Norges Bank has set up the Norwegian Finance Initiative (NFI), which has a permanent advisory board of academics.

“We have a long-term interest in the pursuit of excellence in financial economics carried out by individuals and academic institutions close to us,” Slyngstad said in his closing address to the conference.

“The fund will benefit if we conduct our business in an environment where conventional views are challenged and people strive for new insight.”

NBIM manages the Government Pension Fund Global – which is often referred to as the Norwegian oil fund – and most of Norges Bank’s foreign exchange reserves.

Sponsored Content

Slyngstad said the focus of research would be in areas that could directly benefit the fund and have a practical influence on its investment decision-making.

“Development in asset pricing and portfolio theory goes to the heart of how we think about, define and develop the fund’s strategy,” he said.

“Other areas of financial economics also have direct relevance to our business. Corporate finance and research on corporate governance issues will influence how we exercise our ownership rights and develop ownership policies.

“I also believe that research in the field of market microstructure, how the different marketplaces work, and the impact our own actions have on these markets, is a rich field for future research. New insights in the field of market microstructure may influence how we execute trades.”

The initiative’s Scientific Advisory Board will feature prominent academics and is chaired by Richard Green, a professor of financial economics at the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University.

A former president of the American Finance Association and former editor of the Review of Financial Studies and the Journal of Finance, Green’s research interests include the pricing of financial assets and the effects of risk and taxes on financial asset returns and corporate decision-making.

The other members of the board are Per Strömberg and Annette Vissing-Jørgensen.

Strömberg is the director of the Institute for Financial Research (SIFR) and professor of finance at the Stockholm School of Economics. He is also an adjunct professor of finance at the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago. His research has primarily focused on the two areas of bankruptcy and private equity finance.

Annette Vissing-Jørgensen is professor of finance at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Her research covers household portfolio choice, stock market participation, returns to entrepreneurial investment and corporate governance.

“The research interests of the members of the Scientific Advisory Board are of direct relevance to the fund’s management and what we hope to achieve through the NFI,” Slyngstad said.

The conference was opened by Oystein Olsen, the governor of Norges Bank.

He said the scholars presenting papers at the conference analysed how and why market risk premiums vary.

“Financial regulations and financial frictions are important to our understanding of why risk premiums change over time,” he told the conference.

“A thorough understanding of financial regulations and financial frictions might also be important in identifying unique investor characteristics.”

Addressing the question of financial regulation and its potential effects on markets was Axel Weber, the former head of the German Bundesbank.

Now professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Weber is set to be appointed to the board of Swiss banking giant UBS next year.

He was also a member of the governing council of the European Central Bank between 2004 and 2011, and in recent years also acted as a member of the steering committee on the European Systemic Risk Board.

Other prominent speakers at the one-day event included Kenneth Froot, who is a professor of business administration at the Harvard Business School.

Froot talked about rare events and disaster risks, and how these events are priced in markets.

He also gave insights on individual investor characteristics which give comparative advantages in holding these priced risk premiums.

Kenneth French, a professor of finance at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, spoke about the two ways an investor can generate excess returns by using informational advantages and by systematically harvesting risk premiums, which the investor has a comparative advantage in holding.

Both Froot and French talked about average portfolio weights in highly competitive markets.

But in the last academic address at the conference, Stanley Zin, a professor of economics and business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business, covered how different investors will change asset weights over time.

Zin, whose work has been credited with having a major influence on modern asset pricing models, also discussed what kind of risks an investor is exposed to through rebalancing and why different investors might look at the same risk-reward trade-off differently.

Also from New York, Lasse Pedersen, a professor of finance and alternative investments at the NYU Stern School of Business, addressed liquidity and frictional finance.

Pedersen is part of the Liquidity Working Group meeting at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to address liquidity issues. He also serves on the New York Fed’s Monetary Policy Panel.

His research has focused on the microstructure of funding markets and how liquidity risks create systemic problems. At the conference he covered frictions in financial markets.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous