New York fund manages in-house environmental funds

The $109 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund will internally manage $200 million allocated to companies in the FTSE Environmental Technology 50 and the HSBC Global Climate Change Index under the fund’s green strategic investment program.

The program was created by New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, in April last year to increase commitments to environmentally-focused strategies across the whole portfolio by $500 million in three years. In June, $200 million was allocated to Generation Investment Management.

The fund, which is the third largest in the US, manages the majority of its equities in-house, under senior investment officer, Robert Arnold. Nearly three-quarters of the domestic equity exposure is managed using structured index management, including S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600 funds.

The FTSE Environmental Technology Index requires companies to have at least 50 per cent of their business derived from environmental markets and technologies, and was developed in collaboration with Impax Asset management.

It measures the performance of companies globally whose core business is in the development and deployment of environmental technologies, including renewable and alternative energy, energy efficiency, water technology and waste and pollution control.

Sponsored Content

The FTSE50 comprises the 50 largest companies, and as at the end of December 2008 the companies with the largest weights were: Vestas Wind Systems, Suez Environment, First Solar Inc, Stericycle Inc and Novozymes A/S.

The HSBC Global Climate Change Benchmark Index was launched in 2007, with the research team at HSBC identifying about 300 companies that were well positioned to benefit from the challenges of climate change. There are now about 377 companies in the index. From this HSBC has also established four investable climate change indices that can be used to create portfolios: the climate change index; low carbon energy production index; energy efficiency
and energy management index; water, waste and pollution control index.

DiNapoli said FTSE and HSBC would help the fund take its indexed equity investments into a promising market sector.

“This move should help deliver strong risk-adjusted returns to the fund while providing capital to environmentally sustainable companies that are providing solutions to climate change,” he said.

At the time of the Green Strategic Investment Program announcement last year the fund had $40 million invested in private equity funds focused on renewable energy and clean technologies, and more than $440 million in commitments to funds where clean tech was a component of the overall strategy including more than $16 million
invested in New York-based clean tech companies through the fund’s instate co-investment program.

The fund has been reviewing the clean tech and renewable energy sectors for potential private equity investments since 2005. DiNapoli’s Green Strategic Investment Program allows for the expansion of the fund’s private equity exposure to these sectors while encouraging additional investments across the fund’s entire portfolio.

“Clean technology and renewable energy have become increasingly profitable,” DiNapoli said at the time. “It’s not just about doing good for the environment; going green is good for the bottom line too. The Common Retirement Fund has a unique opportunity to produce strong, risk-adjusted returns while at the same time supporting our goal of curbing greenhouse gas emissions and decreasing our dependence on foreign energy sources. This investment commitment will put us half a billion dollars ahead of the green curve.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous