New York fund manages in-house environmental funds

The $109 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund will internally manage $200 million allocated to companies in the FTSE Environmental Technology 50 and the HSBC Global Climate Change Index under the fund’s green strategic investment program.

The program was created by New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, in April last year to increase commitments to environmentally-focused strategies across the whole portfolio by $500 million in three years. In June, $200 million was allocated to Generation Investment Management.

The fund, which is the third largest in the US, manages the majority of its equities in-house, under senior investment officer, Robert Arnold. Nearly three-quarters of the domestic equity exposure is managed using structured index management, including S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600 funds.

The FTSE Environmental Technology Index requires companies to have at least 50 per cent of their business derived from environmental markets and technologies, and was developed in collaboration with Impax Asset management.

It measures the performance of companies globally whose core business is in the development and deployment of environmental technologies, including renewable and alternative energy, energy efficiency, water technology and waste and pollution control.

Sponsored Content

The FTSE50 comprises the 50 largest companies, and as at the end of December 2008 the companies with the largest weights were: Vestas Wind Systems, Suez Environment, First Solar Inc, Stericycle Inc and Novozymes A/S.

The HSBC Global Climate Change Benchmark Index was launched in 2007, with the research team at HSBC identifying about 300 companies that were well positioned to benefit from the challenges of climate change. There are now about 377 companies in the index. From this HSBC has also established four investable climate change indices that can be used to create portfolios: the climate change index; low carbon energy production index; energy efficiency
and energy management index; water, waste and pollution control index.

DiNapoli said FTSE and HSBC would help the fund take its indexed equity investments into a promising market sector.

“This move should help deliver strong risk-adjusted returns to the fund while providing capital to environmentally sustainable companies that are providing solutions to climate change,” he said.

At the time of the Green Strategic Investment Program announcement last year the fund had $40 million invested in private equity funds focused on renewable energy and clean technologies, and more than $440 million in commitments to funds where clean tech was a component of the overall strategy including more than $16 million
invested in New York-based clean tech companies through the fund’s instate co-investment program.

The fund has been reviewing the clean tech and renewable energy sectors for potential private equity investments since 2005. DiNapoli’s Green Strategic Investment Program allows for the expansion of the fund’s private equity exposure to these sectors while encouraging additional investments across the fund’s entire portfolio.

“Clean technology and renewable energy have become increasingly profitable,” DiNapoli said at the time. “It’s not just about doing good for the environment; going green is good for the bottom line too. The Common Retirement Fund has a unique opportunity to produce strong, risk-adjusted returns while at the same time supporting our goal of curbing greenhouse gas emissions and decreasing our dependence on foreign energy sources. This investment commitment will put us half a billion dollars ahead of the green curve.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Agent provocateur

Paul Smith, the Hong Kong based chief executive of the Global CFA Society is on an evangelical mission to change the culture within the investment industry. Not only is he looking to curb the frequency of excess behaviour that leaves the public cynical of high paid finance professionals, but he is a persuasive advocate for

Do long-term mandates produce better results?

About 11 years ago, the Towers Watson’s Thinking Ahead Group came up with the concept of investors appointing managers for 10-year mandates. The consulting arm then started talking to clients about it in 2004/05 and the early mandates have now matured. So did it work? Do longer-term mandates produce outperformance, better behaviour and more security?

GRESB infrastructure launch

A new infrastructure sustainability benchmark has been developed by a group of eight institutional investors, alongside GRESB, to enable systematic evaluation and industry benchmarking of the sustainability performance of their infrastructure assets.   Despite large and widespread allocations by Canadian and Australian pension funds to infrastructure, institutional investors globally do not have large allocations to

Frozen by the entanglement of risk

Equity prices in continental Europe and emerging markets, including China, are below fair value, and present an opportunity for investors, but the ‘entanglement of risk’ in current markets is making Brian Singer, partner and head of dynamical allocation strategies team, William Blair cautious. William Blair typically targets around 10 per cent volatility in its portfolios,

Exchanges need to adapt to institutional demands: Norges

Institutional investors now dominate the free float holdings of listed companies and exchanges need to adapt to this enduring change in market structure and investor needs, according to Norges Bank Investment Management, manager of the $818 billion Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. Norges Bank, which itself owns around 1 per cent of the world’s listed stock,

Dalio says Fed should focus on secular forces

The US Federal Reserve is not paying enough attention to secular forces affecting the market, according to chairman and founder of Bridgewater, Ray Dalio, who says the “risks of the world being at or near the end of its long-term debt cycle are significant”. In an opinion piece posted on LinkedIn, The Dangerous Long Bias

Previous