New Jersey chair calls for allocation review

Chair of the investment council of the $70 billion State of New Jersey’s Division of Investment, Robert Grady, has called for a new asset allocation plan, pointing in particular to the fund’s cash position which sits at around 2.75 per cent. The fund has also been overweight its domestic equity allocation by about 6 per cent since the last target was set in March.

At the November board meeting, director Tim Walsh advised the division was working to reduce the fund’s cash position, and Grady said “the need to look at the fund’s cash position was particularly germane given the need to dvelop a new asset allcoaiton plan”.

At that board meeting, the fund’s consultant, Peter Kelioutis of Strategic Investment Solutions, said a new asset allocation plan would not be set at the annual meeting; rather, the council would debate approaches to ascertain what was best for the fund.

The fund’s last asset allocation change saw US equities reduced from 21.85 per cent to 18 per cent, but it has been overweight this level by about 6 per cent each month since.

Kelioutis said if a new asset allocation was recommended after the meeting, it would most likely be adopted in the Northern hemisphere spring, one year since the current plan was adopted.

The major change in March 2010, which was decreasing target allocation for US equities, was done to reflect the 2009 market rally, according to the 2010-2011 investment plan outline.

Sponsored Content

The outline acknowledged this allocation was substantially overweight relative to the 2009 ranges set for public equities, and underweight in inflation-sensitive and alternative investments. Since the new asset allocation the difference between target allocations and actual allocations have jumped from 4.53 per cent in February 2010 to 7.19 per cent in April 2010.

At the end of November, the financial year-to-date performance for the fund was 8.71 per cent, slightly outperforming its benchmark’s 8.53 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous