New Jersey chair calls for allocation review

Chair of the investment council of the $70 billion State of New Jersey’s Division of Investment, Robert Grady, has called for a new asset allocation plan, pointing in particular to the fund’s cash position which sits at around 2.75 per cent. The fund has also been overweight its domestic equity allocation by about 6 per cent since the last target was set in March.

At the November board meeting, director Tim Walsh advised the division was working to reduce the fund’s cash position, and Grady said “the need to look at the fund’s cash position was particularly germane given the need to dvelop a new asset allcoaiton plan”.

At that board meeting, the fund’s consultant, Peter Kelioutis of Strategic Investment Solutions, said a new asset allocation plan would not be set at the annual meeting; rather, the council would debate approaches to ascertain what was best for the fund.

The fund’s last asset allocation change saw US equities reduced from 21.85 per cent to 18 per cent, but it has been overweight this level by about 6 per cent each month since.

Kelioutis said if a new asset allocation was recommended after the meeting, it would most likely be adopted in the Northern hemisphere spring, one year since the current plan was adopted.

The major change in March 2010, which was decreasing target allocation for US equities, was done to reflect the 2009 market rally, according to the 2010-2011 investment plan outline.

Sponsored Content

The outline acknowledged this allocation was substantially overweight relative to the 2009 ranges set for public equities, and underweight in inflation-sensitive and alternative investments. Since the new asset allocation the difference between target allocations and actual allocations have jumped from 4.53 per cent in February 2010 to 7.19 per cent in April 2010.

At the end of November, the financial year-to-date performance for the fund was 8.71 per cent, slightly outperforming its benchmark’s 8.53 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous