NEST believes in passive management

A preference for passive management underpins the investment beliefs of the new UK defined contribution fund, NEST, which has finally outlined its investment approach.

Although one of the beliefs is that passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection, it also says that taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term.

The seven investment beliefs also incorporate environmental, social and governance factors and that risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance.

Retirement Date Funds are the default fund option for NEST, and the expectation is that 90 per cent of members will invest in the 45 NEST Retirement Date Funds on offer.

Members will be enrolled into the fund that targets the year they are expected to want to take their money out of the fund Additional fund choices include a higher risk fund, a lower growth fund, a Sharia fund, an ethical fund, and a pre-retirement fund.

The investment target for the funds is investment returns in excess of inflation after all charges over the long term. In the growth phase the performance target will be CPI plus 3 per cent

Sponsored Content

There are three phases in accumulation – the foundation, growth and consolidation phases – and the transition between them will be managed dynamically on the basis of what is happening in financial markets and the economy.

Chair of NEST, Lawrence Churchill said that agreeing the investment approach was a significant landmark for NEST in achieving its aim of helping millions save confidently for retirement.

“The investment strategy will develop over time and we are confident our approach will encourage saving and support our members in achieving their aspirations for retirement.”

NEST investment beliefs

1. That understanding scheme member characteristics, circumstances and attitudes is essential to developing and maintaining an appropriate investment strategy

2. That as long-term investors, incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors within the investment process is in the interests of members

3. That taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term

4. That diversification is the key tool for managing risk and return

5. That risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance

6. That analysis of both economic conditions and market regimes should be used to drive strategic decisions

7. That passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous