NEST believes in passive management

A preference for passive management underpins the investment beliefs of the new UK defined contribution fund, NEST, which has finally outlined its investment approach.

Although one of the beliefs is that passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection, it also says that taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term.

The seven investment beliefs also incorporate environmental, social and governance factors and that risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance.

Retirement Date Funds are the default fund option for NEST, and the expectation is that 90 per cent of members will invest in the 45 NEST Retirement Date Funds on offer.

Members will be enrolled into the fund that targets the year they are expected to want to take their money out of the fund Additional fund choices include a higher risk fund, a lower growth fund, a Sharia fund, an ethical fund, and a pre-retirement fund.

The investment target for the funds is investment returns in excess of inflation after all charges over the long term. In the growth phase the performance target will be CPI plus 3 per cent

Sponsored Content

There are three phases in accumulation – the foundation, growth and consolidation phases – and the transition between them will be managed dynamically on the basis of what is happening in financial markets and the economy.

Chair of NEST, Lawrence Churchill said that agreeing the investment approach was a significant landmark for NEST in achieving its aim of helping millions save confidently for retirement.

“The investment strategy will develop over time and we are confident our approach will encourage saving and support our members in achieving their aspirations for retirement.”

NEST investment beliefs

1. That understanding scheme member characteristics, circumstances and attitudes is essential to developing and maintaining an appropriate investment strategy

2. That as long-term investors, incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors within the investment process is in the interests of members

3. That taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term

4. That diversification is the key tool for managing risk and return

5. That risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance

6. That analysis of both economic conditions and market regimes should be used to drive strategic decisions

7. That passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous