Funds must rethink global equities, says consultant

Mercer Investment Consulting has undertaken a review of global equities and is about to roll out to clients a paper which questions traditional cap-weighted benchmarks.


Andrew Kirton, global head of investment consulting for Mercer in London, said the work would be presented to clients within the next few weeks. He was speaking during the three-city Mercer Asia Pacific Investment Forum – in Sydney, Beijing and Hong Kong between April 20-26 – although he was unable to attend the Sydney event because of the airline delays.

“We have questioned all the assumptions in our clients’ global equity portfolios,” Kirton said. “They are mostly invested in developed markets with a home-country bias and big US component ” But the emerging markets are under-represented and arguably have better prospects than the West. Funds may be limiting themselves.”

The problem for investors in the West, however, is that the big emerging markets such as China and India still have very volatile listed markets where access is not as easy as in the developed markets. There are also different risks associated with some emerging markets, including political risks.

Kirton said that Mercer was looking to provide some more “frontier thinking” about global portfolios, not just in allocations between developed and developing markets.

He said, for instance, there was now a fair body of evidence to suggest that low-volatility stocks tended to provide a better risk/return profile over time than high-volatility stocks.

Sponsored Content

Mercer revamped its investment consulting research last year with the addition of several “boutiques” within the firm, which also resulted in increased research resources for alternative asset classes.

The move was in response to the growth of specialist asset consulting firms as well as the changing relationship between consultants and funds, whereby many funds are increasing their in-house investment teams.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous