Funds must rethink global equities, says consultant

Mercer Investment Consulting has undertaken a review of global equities and is about to roll out to clients a paper which questions traditional cap-weighted benchmarks.


Andrew Kirton, global head of investment consulting for Mercer in London, said the work would be presented to clients within the next few weeks. He was speaking during the three-city Mercer Asia Pacific Investment Forum – in Sydney, Beijing and Hong Kong between April 20-26 – although he was unable to attend the Sydney event because of the airline delays.

“We have questioned all the assumptions in our clients’ global equity portfolios,” Kirton said. “They are mostly invested in developed markets with a home-country bias and big US component ” But the emerging markets are under-represented and arguably have better prospects than the West. Funds may be limiting themselves.”

The problem for investors in the West, however, is that the big emerging markets such as China and India still have very volatile listed markets where access is not as easy as in the developed markets. There are also different risks associated with some emerging markets, including political risks.

Kirton said that Mercer was looking to provide some more “frontier thinking” about global portfolios, not just in allocations between developed and developing markets.

He said, for instance, there was now a fair body of evidence to suggest that low-volatility stocks tended to provide a better risk/return profile over time than high-volatility stocks.

Sponsored Content

Mercer revamped its investment consulting research last year with the addition of several “boutiques” within the firm, which also resulted in increased research resources for alternative asset classes.

The move was in response to the growth of specialist asset consulting firms as well as the changing relationship between consultants and funds, whereby many funds are increasing their in-house investment teams.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous