Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair

The time for ideological argument was over, said the chair of the Stronger Super Committee, Paul Costello, and the industry should work constructively to implement the Australian Government’s response to the Cooper Review.

Costello and the rest of the committee met for the first time last week with the Minister for Superannuation, Bill Shorten, and the first priority was to appoint working committees for the four reform streams to be implemented: MySuper, SuperStream, Governance and SMSFs.

While the committee will provide broad, high-level advice on the design and implementation of the reforms, the working committees will drill down into technical specifics, and give practitioners beyond those on the committee a chance for further input.

Costello said this should address any concerns about a lack of direct operational expertise on the committee, none of whom have ever run a large super fund, with the exception of course of Costello himself. (He was CEO at Superannuation Trust of Australia and New Zealand Super, before his four-year stint at the helm of the Future Fund Management Agency.)

The working committees are close to be finalised, Costello said. Their prompt formation was necessary because Costello planned to hand the Federal Treasury the Committee’s implementation recommendations by “May or June”.

The industry veteran said he wanted to be part of the Stronger Super implementation because it could help provide a better retirement for working Australians, and he urged stakeholders to keep that goal in mind.

Sponsored Content

“The [Stronger Super] report will record where there are differences in preferred approach by the committee members, but I think the Government is really interested in consensus,” he said.

Acknowledging that ‘MySuper’ was one of the most controversial aspects of the reforms, Costello said the committee would give regard to maximising the long-term net returns received by working Australians, and not just minimising the upfront costs incurred by their fund.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

One response to “Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Did they say that? CIO quotes from 2013

Each year conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com interviews CIOs and executive staff of the world’s largest asset owners, gaining insight into their investment strategy, asset allocation and demands from managers. In 2013 funds were focused on costs, increased portfolio look-through, “partnering” with managers and how to position fixed income exposures. This selection of quotes from CIOs of some of

Merton’s message: give up on alpha

Nobel Prize winner, Robert Merton, has thrown down the gauntlet. He claims that by focusing on a retirement income goal he can beat any competitor that is managing a 70:30 portfolio that has wealth accumulation as the goal. Do you dare take him on? The defined contribution pension management industry has it wrong, according to

New York’s budget, how would you spend it?

The city of New York spent $472.5 million on asset manager fees in 2012/13. The allocation of these funds is part of the $68 billion annual budget the City Comptroller has to run the city of New York. The bureau of asset management that oversees the $137.4 billion in pensions fits within that budget, but

Carbon credit market gets a boost

Norway and Britain have both announced plans to buy carbon credits, giving the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism a boost.   Sovereign institutions have thrown a lifeline to the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism, CDM, set up under the Kyoto Protocol which awards tradable carbon credits to projects like wind farms or solar

Contingent-COLAs the cornerstone of reform success

What can other states can adopt from the pension reforms at Rhode Island. The most significant item from the pension reform at Rhode Island is the fact the Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) is conditional. Or in other words, the fund will only pay the COLA if it can afford to do so. This simple

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Previous