Largest pension funds get bigger

Container terminal in pier

The world’s biggest funds are gaining even more market share, and arguably more influence, over the world’s pension capital. The largest 300 funds now account for 43.2 per cent of all global pension assets.

Further, the capital is becoming even more concentrated at the very top, with the largest 20 funds in the world accounting for 40.3 per cent of the assets of the Willis Towers Watson 300 ranking, the Pensions & Investments/Willis Towers Watson 300 Analysis for the year 2016 states.

The report shows that assets under management (AUM) at the world’s largest 300 funds totalled $15.7 trillion at the end of 2016, up by 6.1 per cent for the year.

The top 20 funds increased assets by an even greater proportion, 7.1 per cent, bringing their combined assets to about $6.9 trillion. These funds invest about 41.7 per cent of their assets in equities, 37.2 per cent in fixed income and 21.1 per cent in alternatives and cash.

North America remained the largest region in terms of AUM, with 44.1 per cent of all assets, including 134 US-based funds in the top 300. The Asia-Pacific region’s funds and European funds each accounted for 26.1 per cent of AUM in the top 300.

The Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan remains the largest fund in the world, with assets of more than $1.2 trillion at the end of December 2016.

Sponsored Content

The size of this fund is overwhelming, with its assets 39 per cent larger than the second fund in the ranking, the Government Pension Fund of Norway.

The P&I/WTW report states that, of the top 20 funds, nine emphasised the increased volatility and uncertainty in global markets. These funds mentioned several key factors to explain such high global market volatility.

“[The year] 2016 was truly an extraordinary investment year. Unexpected political events like Brexit and a new US administration as well as changed monetary policy signals from several central banks had a significant impact on financial markets,” said Bjarne Graven Larsen, chief investment officer of Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which ranks number 18.

Despite the volatility, positive market returns for all major asset classes helped boost pension assets during the year.

 

2016 P&I/WTW 300 ranking (in $ million)

Rank Fund Market Total assets
1 Government Pension Investment Fund Japan $1,237,636
2 Government Pension Fund Norway $893,088
3 Federal Retirement Thrift US $485,575
4 National Pension Service South Korea $462,161
5 ABP Netherlands $404,310
6 National Social Security China $348,662
7 California Public Employees Retirement System US $306,633
8 Canada Pension Plan Canada $235,790
9 Central Provident Fund Singapore $227,102
10 PFZW Netherlands $196,461
11 California State Teachers Retirement System US $198,871
12 New York State Common US $184,461
13 Pension Fund Association for Local Government Officials Japan $183,161
14 New York City Employees’ Retirement System US $171,574
15 Employees Provident Fund Malaysia $165,464
16 State Board of Administration of Florida US $153,942
17 Teacher Retirement System of Texas US $133,221
18 Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Canada $130,642
19 Government Employees Pension Fund South Africa $119,186
20 ATP Denmark $113,160

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Social networks in the investment web

Reels of financial data and analysis coupled with the occasional piece of market gossip or personal hunch are the time-honoured tools investors rely on in building an active portfolio. More recently, an element of sustainability or corporate governance analysis has tried to muscle into the process. Soon there will be another revolutionary option complementing financial

Eijffinger’s decade of financial repression

Financial repression will define the economic landscape for at least another decade, according to professor of financial economics at Tilburg University, Sylvester Eijffinger, which has serious implications for institutional investors. Eijffinger, who also is also a visiting professor at Harvard, sits on the monetary experts panel of the European Union and is an adviser to

Is reviving Europe a suspended apparition?

Getting Europe’s swelling institutional capital to support long-term projects that could benefit its uninspired economies was an idea that sent heads nodding around the continent as it suffered the brunt of the financial crisis. Get pension, insurance and foundation money into where it is most needed with the attraction of reliable long-term cash flows and

Let’s talk about underfunding

Even using the assets of the pension plan was not enough of a leg-up to save the city of Detroit from bankruptcy. As the last words in the song Put your hands up for Detroit by Fedde Le Grand say, it is system shutdown. The fiscal demise of this city may be a lesson for

Johnson urges pension simplicity

There is a David-and-Goliath feeling to the battle Michael Johnson, a research fellow at the London-based think tank the Centre for Policy Studies, is waging against the pension industry. His research, which lays out the case for radically simplifying all aspects of the United Kingdom’s pension sector, has earned him a reputation as a maverick.

Disparity in policy portfolio risk profiles

A policy portfolio is a poor reflection of investor preferences, argued Peter Bernstein. This philosophical question has now been empirically tested by MIT’s Mark Kritzman, who shows the inter-temporal disparity of a policy portfolio’s risk profile. He suggests a simple framework for addressing this deficiency. Kritzman encourages investors to replace rigid policy portfolios with flexible investment policies.

Previous