Investors demand company action on climate change

Some of the world’s largest investors have outlined their expectations of how companies should respond to climate change.

Jointly issued by three investor groups on climate change, the document outlines seven steps investors expect companies to take in order to minimise the risks and maximise the opportunities presented by climate change.

The seven steps cover areas of governance, strategy, goals, implementation, measurement, disclosure and public policy.

CalSTRS chief executive Jack Ehnes – who is also on the executive committee of the the Investor Network on Climate Change, one of the three investor groups behind the document – says that the guidelines provide a framework for engagement.

“These guidelines are a clear message to companies that investors expect them to step up and better navigate this complex climate challenge,” Ehnes says.

The guidelines are seen as being of particular importance for companies in carbon-intensive sectors, and those who may not have a considered strategy for managing climate change risks.

Sponsored Content

The guidelines demand companies report and disclose emission inventories as well as articulate in annual reports what the management deems to be the company’s material climate change risks and opportunities.

The other investor groups involved in formulating the guidelines are the European Institutional Investor Group on Climate Change and the Investors Group on Climate Change based in Australia and New Zealand.

To read the statement click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous