How many top100 sustainable companies do you invest in?

The most sustainable 100 companies in the world, as measured by Corporate Knights, outperformed the MSCI by 12.4 per cent since the list’s inception in February 2005, it was announced at Davos last week.

From February 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011, the “Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations” list has achieved a total return of 41.7 per cent, outperforming the MSCI All Country World Index, which returned 29.30 per cent over the same time period.

The list is compiled by assessing 11 key performance indicators (listed below) including linking senior executive pay to remuneration.

Chief executive of Corporate Knights, Toby Heaps, says the Global 100 shows it is now possible to score companies on clean capitalism criteria with a quantitative approach.

He says a minor revolution due to more readily available ESG data, combined with the industry group comparison synthesis his company uses, removes a crucial barrier that has been preventing institutional investors from integrating ESG into their passive strategies.

This year the number one ranked company in the global 100 was the Danish Novo Nordisk, which is the only pharmaceutical company in the list to report the link between CEO remuneration and corporate performance on clean capitalism KPIs.

Sponsored Content

Chief executive of Corporate Knights, Toby Heaps, says: “The Global 100 companies serve as ambassadors for a better, cleaner kind of capitalism which, it also turns out, is more profitable.”

“Employee turnover” was included as a new indicator for the first time this year.

It is the eighth year annual list of the most sustainable large corporations in the world, and this year the companies were recognised at the Davos World Economic Forum at a private dinner hosted by Corporate Knights and Inflection Point Capital Management.

Heaps says the mission of CK Capital, which provides a suite of products based on the passive methodology, has a seven-year goal to enable $1 trillion of assets to be optimised to clean-cap, volatility-reducing criteria.

Global 100 Key Performance Indicators Definitions
• Energy productivity ($) – sales ($) / total direct and indirect energy consumption (gigajoules)
• Carbon productivity ($) – sales ($) / total CO2 and CO2 equivalents emissions (tonnes)
• Water productivity ($) – sales ($) / total water use (cubic meters)
• Waste productivity ($) – sales ($) / total amount of waste produced (tonnes)
• Leadership diversity – percentage of women board directors
• CEO-to-average worker pay – ratio of highest paid officer’s compensation to average employee compensation (three-year average)
• Percentage tax paid – percentage reported tax obligation paid in cash (three-year average)
• Safety productivity – sales ($) / lost-time incidents*$50k and fatalities*$1M)
• Sustainability remuneration – whether or not at least one senior officer has his/her pay linked to sustainability
• Innovation capacity – R&D/sales (three-year average)
• Employee turnover – total number of employees who leave the organisation voluntarily or due to dismissal, retirement, or death in service as a percentage of the total employee numbers at the end of the reporting period.

For the full list of the most sustainable companies click here: http://www.global100.org/annual-lists/2012-global-100-list.html

 

 


Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous