GIC claws back half of 20 per cent investment loss

The Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) has recovered almost half of last financial year’s investment loss in recent months thanks to the revival in global stock markets, after recording a 20 per cent fall in assets in the year ending March 31, 2009.

In its annual report, group chief investment officer Ng Kok Song said GIC reduced public equities by more than 10 per cent between July 2007 to September 2008, and in early 2009 decided this defensive position was no longer warranted, restoring public equities to pre-crisis levels (38 per cent).

He said in recent years, GIC had sought to construct a diversified multi-asset class portfolio by increasing alternative
investments such as private equity and real estate, but this diversification was ineffective in the 2008 “financial earthquake”.

As at 31 March, 2009 GIC’s asset allocation was: 38 per cent public equities, 24 per cent fixed income, 30 per cent alternatives and 8 per cent cash.

This represents a reduction in public equities of 6 per cent compared to 31 March 2008, a 2 per cent hike in bond
exposure, a 7 per cent increase to alternative assets and a 1 per cent addition to the cash reserves.

Sponsored Content

Tony Tan Keng Yam, deputy chairman and executive director at GIC, said the fund would not be distracted by short-term market movements.

“In recent months, we have recovered a good part of our losses as the markets performed better,” he said.

“But as a long-term oriented investor, we will not be distracted. GIC will remain forward-looking and seize good investment opportunities that will help us achieve our goal of achieving a reasonable rate of return above global inflation over the long term.”

The 20 per cent investment loss in Singapore dollar terms for the financial year ending 31 March 2009 dragged down the real rate of return, in excess of global inflation, from 4.5 per cent to 2.6 per cent.

During the financial year, GIC’s investments in the Americas increased from 40 per cent to 45 per cent; those in Europe decreased from 35 per cent to 29 per cent; and in Asia they increased slightly from 23 per cent to 24 per cent as a result of the “normal selection of investment opportunities”.

Large investments made in early 2008 included UBS Ag and Citigroup, which according to the annual report were made “to capitalise on the unique business franchises of UBS in global wealth management, and of Citigroup in global consumer and corporate banking, especially in the emerging economies”.

Song said the financial crisis would bring fundamental changes to the investment landscape, requiring GIC to adapt its
investment strategy accordingly.

These changes included:

-Less funds available for leveraged
investments as lending institutions face more onerous capital adequacy
requirements and asset securitisation markets remain impaired;

-Regulatory intervention is likely to
dampen risk-taking, with hedge funds and private equity funds subject to
greater disclosure of their activities;

-Global economic growth will be higher in
the emerging than the developed economies. The developed economies will undergo
further deleveraging while the emerging economies will be compelled to engender
domestic demand;

-After a prolonged period of disinflation
in the global economy, there is greater risk of rising inflation. Government
and central banks might face political constraints in withdrawing recently
injected fiscal and monetary stimuli in an environment of high unemployment.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous