GFC fallout hits funds as AP2 reports losses

Andra AP-fonden, Sweden’s Second Swedish National Pension Fund (AP2) has taken a big hit from the turmoil in global markets, its capital value falling by SEK55.1 billion ($US6.6 billion) in 2008.

AP2 blamed “the sharp decline of the world’s stock markets in 2008″ after the fund returned -24 per cent and its asset value fell from SEK227.5 billion to SEK173.3 billion.

During the year, the fund reported a net inflow of SEK0.9 billion, so the net loss for the year was SEK55.1 billion.

The fund admitted the poor performance of the equities portfolios had the greatest impact on the net result.

Swedish equities returned -42 per cent in 2008, while foreign equities returned -29.5 per cent.

“This is without doubt one of the most serious financial crises since the 1930s,” says Eva Halvarsson, chief executive officer of AP2.

Sponsored Content

“In spite of deciding to reduce risk in the equity portfolios under in-house management, to reduce the scale of our positions in fixed income and exchange-market securities and to cancel a number of investment strategies completely, the decline in market worth was still substantial.”

Overall, market-quoted assets, excluding commission fees and operating expenses, posted a relative return of -1.8 per cent.

“This weak result is attributable to a number of the fund’s different equity mandates and some OTC-products that were poorly positioned in the period of extreme turbulence experienced by the financial market during the autumn,” the fund said.

“Furthermore, as a result of the financial crisis, almost all active investment mandates, in-house and external, underperformed simultaneously.”

Fixed income assets faired best with a return of 16.6 per cent, while alternative investments returned -1.9 per cent.

AP2’s return on unquoted holdings was -1.9 per cent, which included real estate and private equity funds.

Asset Owner:AP Fonden 2 (AP2)

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous