Future Fund general manager to have his say on superannuation reform

The Australian Future Fund’s former general manager, Paul Costello, is the chair of a committee advising the government on the implementation of what could be the most important reforms to the $1.3 trillion Australian superannuation industry since the introduction of compulsory super in 1992.

The ‘stronger super peak consultative group’ will begin detailed consultation of the government’s stronger super reform package – a response to the Cooper Review of superannuation – later this month.

The reform agenda covers default investment strategies, administration platforms and trustee governance of the system.

Representatives of key stakeholders in the super sector, including employers, employees, industry service providers and consumer advocates, comprise the group and are expected to meet in February.

Several working groups will also support the group and will cover MySuper governance, self-managed superannuation funds, and SuperStream.

The Future Fund, which (including Telstra shares), manages assets of $71.76 billion, is yet to replace Costello, who left the fund late last year. He was at the fund for nearly four years.

Sponsored Content

The Future Fund returned 7.5 per cent for the year to the end of December. The biggest portfolio changes in the past year have been a reduction in allocation to debt securities 25.4 to 18.8 per cent, with a subsequent rise in alternatives from 11.4 to 15.2 per cent.

In the last quarter of the year, the fund’s cash assets decreased, having reached an abnormal hight in September due to the fund’s policy of substantially hedging its foreign currency exposures so that 80 per cent of the portfolio is held in A$.

There were large inflows as a result of the Australian dollar’s appreciation which lifted the cash holding over the September quarter. At the end of the year cash sat at about 15.8 per cent, and the fund is expected to reduce this further as existing unfunded commitments are drawn down and additional opportunities are identified.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous