Funds empty their clips as Sudan divides

As Sudan divides into north and south, CalPERS and other UN PRI funds are divesting shares in public companies in that country, while at the same time warning on the fragile peace and the precarious economy.

CalPERS, the US’s largest public pension fund with about $236 billion in market assets, now owns stock in only eight companies in Sudan and Iran, down from 47 companies five years ago. The amount invested has, accordingly, fallen from $2 billion to $160 million.

This sell-off has been in line with California’s divestment Acts, with Rob Feckner, CalPERS’ board president, saying the fund also would not make any new investments in the countries.

“The cost of continuing to hold the stock of these eight companies is greater than the value of divesting them,” he said.

Strong sanctions adopted last year by the US federal government, the UN and the EU prompted the withdrawal of several large multinational oil and energy companies from Sudan and Iran.

The 12 signatories, including CalPERS, to the Sudan Engagement Group (SEG) statement diplomatically urged oil companies such as CNPC/PetroChina, Sinopec, ONGC, and Petronas to do more “to address risks and opportunities associated with operating in Sudan”.

Sponsored Content

The statement congratulated companies such as Schlumberger, Total and Petrofac for their “balanced focus on economic purpose and social development in the region that, in the long run, should lead to greater benefits for all concerned”.

Shareowners could be a force for peace, said Doug Pearce, CEO/CIO of the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BC IMC), one of the members of the Sudan Engagement Group and a signatory to the statement.

“Shareowners can be instrumental in using our investment capital to be a positive force for human rights, community development and economic growth in Sudan,” he said.

The SEG statement was signed by 12 investors with $2.7 trillion in assets under management: APG, Aviva Investors, BCIMC, CalPERS, Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, Mn Services, New Zealand Superannuation Fund, PGGM Investments, Robeco, The Co-operative Asset Management, and Universities Superannuation Scheme.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous